Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

If you say: The generality of His saying, “And the mothers of your wives,” includes both her mother by blood and her foster mother.

The answer is that, when mentioned without qualification, “mother” does not include a foster mother. This is evidenced by His saying, “Forbidden to you are your mothers,” after which He says, “and your mothers who nursed you.” Had the unqualified term “mother” included a foster mother, she would not have been mentioned a second time.

In summary, this view is the preponderant one, even though it differs from the opinion of the majority. So long as the matter is not one of consensus, there is no harm in a person adopting the view he considers sounder. Ibn Rajab related from Shaykh al-Islam that he held this view: that nursing does not establish prohibitions based on marriage ties. Ibn al-Qayyim reported that he had suspended judgment on the matter. There is nothing to prevent his having initially suspended judgment and then later having become clear about the matter, as occurred in many of his views, may Allah have mercy on him. At times, he explicitly states that he retracted a view; at other times, it becomes plainly evident that he retracted it; and at times, he suspends judgment.

If someone says: “I am apprehensive about differing with the majority, and I wish to take the cautious course in both respects. Thus, I say that a wife’s foster mother is not unlawful for the husband; accordingly, I would not permit her to uncover her face before him, in accordance with the view of Shaykh al-Islam, nor would I permit him to marry her, in accordance with the majority. Does this approach have a basis?”

The answer is: Yes. This is found in the story of Saudah bint Zam‘ah, may Allah be pleased with her, when Abd ibn Zam‘ah and Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas, may Allah be pleased with them, disputed over a boy. Sa‘d said: “O Messenger of Allah, this is the son of my brother Utbah, and he had charged me concerning him...”

فإن قلت: إن عموم قوله تعالى: ﴿وَأُمَّهَاتُ نِسَائِكُمْ﴾ يشمل أمها من النسب وأمها من الرضاع. فالجواب: أن الأم عند الإطلاق لا تدخل فيها أم الرضاع، بدليل قوله: ﴿حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمْ أُمَهَاتُكُمْ﴾ ثم قال بعدها: ﴿وَأُمَهَاتُكُمُ اللاَّتِي أَرْضَعْنَكُمْ﴾ ولو كانت الأم عند الإطلاق يدخل فيها أم الرضاع ما ذكرت مرة ثانية. والحاصل: أن هذا القول هو القول الراجح وإن كان خلاف رأي الجمهور؛ لأنه ما دامت المسألة ليست إجماعاً فلا ضير على الإنسان أن يأخذ بقول يراه أصح، وابن رجب نقل عن شيخ الإسلام أنه يرى هذا الرأي: أن الرضاع لا يؤثر في تحريم المصاهرة، وذكر عنه ابن القيم أنه توقف في ذلك، ولا يمنع أن يكون توقف ثم تبين له بعد ذلك الأمر، كما يوجد في كثير من آرائه ﵀، فأحياناً يصرح بأنه رجع عن رأيه أو يتبين واضحاً أنه رجع عن رأيه، وأحياناً يتوقف. فإذا قال قائل: أنا أتهيب من خلاف الجمهور، وأريد أن أسلك الاحتياط من الوجهين، فأقول: إن أم الزوجة من الرضاع ليست حراماً على الزوج، فلا أحل لها أن تكشف وجهها موافقة لقول شيخ الإسلام، ولا أحل له أن يتزوج بها موافقة للجمهور، فهل لهذا المسلك أصل؟ الجواب: نعم، وذلك في قصة سودة بنت زمعة ﵂ حين تنازع عبد بن زمعة وسعد بن أبي وقاص ﵄ في وليد، فقال سعد: يا رسول الله إن هذا ولد من أخي عتبة، وأنه عهد

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies