Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

We answer: We do not say that there is no superiority in leading the prayer. Rather, leading the prayer is a religious office of merit. However, we say that the adhān is superior to leading the prayer because it publicly proclaims the remembrance of Allah and alerts people generally. Thus, the muezzin is an imam for everyone who hears him, since they follow him in determining the beginning of the prayer time, and in beginning and breaking the fast. Moreover, the adhān is generally more demanding than leading the prayer.

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ and his Rightly Guided Caliphs did not give the adhān because they were occupied with what was more important rather than what was important: the imam is connected with all the people, so if he devoted himself to watching for the time, he would be distracted from the Muslims’ essential affairs—especially in earlier times, when there were neither clocks nor readily available means of determining the time.

Both Are Communal Obligations

His statement, “Both are communal obligations,” explains their legal ruling.

Linguistically, an obligation is something cut off. In Islamic law, it is that which is commanded in a binding manner. Is it more emphatic than what is obligatory, or are the two synonymous? (1)

The correct view is that they are synonymous. However, the terminology of the Sacred Law should be observed: whatever is designated as an obligation should be referred to as an obligation; otherwise, it should be expressed in the terms used by the Lawgiver, for this is more appropriate in following Him.

The evidence that they are obligatory is the Prophet’s command to perform them in several hadiths (2), his consistent observance of them both while resident and travelling, the fact that knowledge of the prayer time generally cannot be attained except through them, and the particular need for them, since they are among the manifest symbols of Islam.

(1) See Sharh al-Kawkab al-Munir, 1:351-353. (2) Such as the forthcoming hadith of Malik ibn al-Huwayrith.
فنجيب عليه: بأننا لا نقول لا أفضليَّة في الإمامة، بل الإمامة ولاية شرعيَّة ذات فضل، ولكننا نقول: إنَّ الأذان أفضل من الإمامة لِمَا فيه من إعلان ذكرِ الله وتنبيه النَّاس على سبيل العموم، فالمؤذِّن إمام لكلِّ من سمعه، حيث يُقتدى به في دخول وقت الصَّلاة؛ وإمساك الصَّائم وإفطاره، ولأنَّ الأذان أشقُّ من الإمامة غالباً، وإنَّما لم يؤذِّن رسولُ الله ﷺ وخلفاؤه الرَّاشدون؛ لأنَّهم اشتغلوا بالأهمِّ عن المهم؛ لأنَّ الإمام يتعلَّق به جميع النَّاس، فلو تفرَّغ لمراقبة الوقت لانشغل عن مهمَّات المسلمين، ولا سيَّما في الزَّمن السَّابق حيثُ لا ساعات ولا أدلَّة سهلة. هُمَا فَرْضُ كِفَايةٍ .............. قوله: «هما فرضُ كِفَاية»، هذا بيان لحكمهما. الفرض في اللُّغة: القطع. وشرعاً: ما أُمِرَ به على سبيل الإلزام وهل هو أوكد من الواجب، أم هما بمعنى واحد (١)؟ الصحيح: أنهما بمعنى واحد، لكن ينبغي مراعاة ألفاظ الشَّرع، فما جاء بلفظ الفرض فَلْيُعبَّر عنه بالفرض، وإلا فبما عبَّر عنه الشَّارع؛ لأنَّ هذا أَولى في المتابعة. والدَّليل على فرضيتهما: أَمْرُ النبيِّ ﷺ بهما في عِدَّة أحاديث (٢)، وملازمته لهما في الحضر والسَّفر، ولأنه لا يتمُّ العلم بالوقت إلا بهما غالباً، ولتعيُّن المصلحة بهما؛ لأنَّهما من شعائر الإسلام الظَّاهرة.
(١) انظر: «شرح الكوكب المنير» (١/ ٣٥١ ـ ٣٥٣). (٢) كحديث مالك بن الحويرث الآتي.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies