Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

she bore the child with such-and-such characteristics, it would belong to so-and-so; but if she bore it with such-and-such characteristics, it would belong to Hilal. (1) This indicates that the child may be disavowed before birth. And if we assume that it is not a child, what harm does that cause us?! Indeed, if it is not a child, that is even better; and if it was a child but died before being delivered, the ruling does not change.

As for the second issue—whether the husband’s liʿān alone is sufficient—the correct view is that it is sufficient. For Allah says concerning liʿān: “But it will avert the punishment from her...” In the case where the husband engages in liʿān in order to disavow the child, is she liable to any punishment?

The answer is: she is not liable to punishment, because he has not accused her of fornication, such that punishment would befall her. Liʿān by both spouses is necessary only when he has accused her of fornication, so that she may clear herself. But if a man says, “You have not committed fornication, but this child is not mine,” then the correct view is that there is no objection to this, and that the child’s non-attribution to him is established by the husband’s liʿān alone. He says four times: “I bear witness by Allah that the child in her womb, if she is pregnant—or this child, after it is born—is not mine.” Then, the fifth time, he says that Allah’s curse be upon him if he is lying.

His statement: “If a trustworthy woman testifies that it was born upon his bed, its lineage is attributed to him, and there is no liʿān.” The author, may Allah have mercy on him, has combined one issue with another. His statement, “If a trustworthy woman testifies that it was born upon his bed,” concerns the case where he says this after irrevocably separating from her—that is, after he has made her irrevocably divorced and she then gives birth. He says, “This child is not mine,” but a trustworthy woman testifies that it was born upon his bed before he irrevocably separated from her. This is why he presented it in al-Muqniʿ, which is the basis of this book,

(1) Its source has already been cited on p. 294.
جاءت به على وجه كذا فهو لفلان، وإن جاءت به على وجه كذا فهو لهلال (١)، فدل هذا على أنه يمكن أن ينفى قبل الوضع، وإذا قدرنا أنه ليس بولد، فماذا يضيرنا؟! بل إذا لم يكن هذا ولداً صار أحسن، أو كان ولداً ثم مات قبل أن يوضع فلا يتغير الحكم. وأما المسألة الثانية: وهي أنه هل يكتفى بلعان الزوج وحده؟ فالصحيح أنه يكتفى بذلك؛ لأن الله قال في اللعان: ﴿وَيَدْرَأُ﴾ ﴿عَنْهَا الْعَذَابَ﴾، وفي هذه الحال التي لاعن الزوج من أجل نفي الولد، هل عليها عذاب؟ الجواب: ليس عليها عذاب، لأنه ما قذفها بالزنا حتى يقع عليها العذاب، فالذي لا بد فيه من اللعان بين الزوجين إذا كان قد قذفها بالزنا؛ لأجل أن تبرئ نفسها، وأما رجل يقول: ما زنت، لكن هذا الولد ليس مني، فالصواب أنه لا بأس به، وأنه يثبت انتفاء الولد بمجرد لعان الزوج، فيقول: أشهد بالله أن الولد الذي في بطنها، إن كانت حاملاً أو هذا الولد ـ بعد وضعه ـ ليس مني، يقول ذلك أربع مرات، وفي الخامسة أن لعنة الله عليه إن كان من الكاذبين. قوله: «فشهدت امرأة ثقة أنه ولد على فراشه لحقه نسبه ولا لعان» الماتن ﵀ أدخل مسألة في مسألة، فإن قوله: «فشهدت امرأة ثقة أنه ولد على فراشه» هذه الصورة فيما إذا قاله بعد إبانتها، أي: بعد أن أبانها ولدت، فقال: هذا الولد ليس مني، فشهدت امرأة ثقة أنه ولد على فراشه قبل أن يبينها، ولهذا فرضها في «المقنع» الذي هو أصل هذا الكتاب،
(١) سبق تخريجه ص (٢٩٤).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies