Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

His statement, “a pregnant slave woman, even if he excludes her unborn child”: emancipating a pregnant slave woman is valid, even though she has something that prevents work and clearly impairs her ability to work, because this is temporary and customary.

If someone were to ask, “Does he emancipate her together with the child she carries?” We say: That is not necessary. If he excludes her unborn child, there is no problem. Thus, he may say, “You are free, except for what is in your womb.” This is permissible, and the unborn child remains a slave.

If it is said, “The unborn child is unknown,” we reply: This is not an exchange transaction. An unknown item is impermissible in exchange transactions because the one offering compensation is taking a risk: his affair lies between gain and loss. As for that in which no compensation is involved, it is permissible even if unknown. It was previously mentioned in the chapter on sales that if a person sells something while excluding its unborn offspring, the established position of the school is that this is invalid. The correct view, however, is that it is permissible, because the unborn offspring is known and is not something that diminishes the thing sold itself; rather, it is separate from it. Thus, just as it is valid to sell her when she is not pregnant, it is likewise valid to sell her while pregnant and exclude her unborn child. It was previously established that this is permissible, though an objection was raised against it: the Messenger ﷺ “forbade the sale of unborn offspring” (1). So how can you permit excluding it?

We answered that excluding the unborn offspring in a sale is retention, not the acquisition of a new ownership. When I say to you, “I have sold you this cow—while she is pregnant—except for her unborn offspring,” you have not purchased the unborn offspring from me such that you have offered compensation for something unknown. Rather, it is a retention; and there is a difference between retention and an exchange transaction. In sum, it is permissible to emancipate a pregnant slave woman as an expiation while excluding her unborn child, and the unborn child remains a slave belonging to her master.

(1) Narrated by al-Bukhari in Kitab al-Buyu', chapter: The Sale of Gharar (Uncertainty) and Habal al-Habalah (the sale of an unborn offspring), no. 2143; and by Muslim in Kitab al-Buyu', chapter: The Prohibition of Selling Habal al-Habalah, no. 1514, on the authority of Ibn Umar.
قوله: «والأمة الحامل ولو استثنى حَمْلَها» الأمة الحامل تجزئ، وإن كان فيها شيء يمنع العمل، ويضر بالعمل ضرراً بيناً؛ لأن هذا مؤقت ومعتاد. فإذا قال قائل: يعتقها وحملَها معها، نقول: ما يلزم، فلو استثنى حملها فلا حرج، فيقول: أنت حرة إلا ما في بطنك، فيجوز ويبقى الحمل حرّاً. فإن قيل: الحمل مجهول، قلنا: هذا ليس معاوضة، فالشيء المجهول لا يجوز في المعاوضات؛ لأن باذل العوض مخاطر، وأمره بين الغنم والغرم، أما ما ليس فيه عوض فيجوز ولو كان مجهولاً، وسبق في البيع أن الإنسان إذا باع شيئاً واستثنى الحمل فالمذهب لا يصح، لكن الصحيح أنه يجوز؛ لأن الحمل معلوم، وليس شيئاً ينقص عين المبيع، بل هو منفصل، فكما لو باعها وهي حائل يصح، كذلك لو باعها وهي حامل واستثنى حملها، وقد سبق أنه يجوز وأوردنا عليه إشكالاً، وهو أن الرسول ﵊ «نهى عن بيع الحمل» (١)، فكيف تجيزون الاستثناء؟ وأجبنا عن ذلك بأن استثناء الحمل في البيع استبقاء، وليس تجديد ملك، فأنا عندما أقول لك: بعتك هذه البقرة ـ وهي حامل ـ إلا حملها، فأنت ما اشتريت الحمل مني حتى تكون قد بذلت عوضاً في مجهول؛ وإنما هو استبقاء، وفرق بين الاستبقاء وبين المعاوضة، والحاصل أنه يجوز أن يعتق الحامل في الكفارة، ويستثني حملها، ويكون الحمل رقيقاً لسيدها.
(١) أخرجه البخاري في البيوع/ باب بيع الغرر وحبل الحبلة (٢١٤٣)، ومسلم في البيوع/ باب تحريم بيع حبل الحبلة (١٥١٤) عن ابن عمر ﵄.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies