Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

as He, exalted is He, says: “And your stepdaughters—under your guardianship—born of your wives with whom you have consummated marriage.” [al-Nisa’ 4:23]

Thus, if he says to his wife, “You are to me like your daughter from so-and-so,” he has pronounced ẓihār, because he has likened her to one who is permanently forbidden to him through marital affinity. If he says, “You are to me like the back of your daughter by me,” he has pronounced ẓihār, because he has likened her to one who is permanently forbidden to him through lineage.

His words, “my mother-in-law”: a mother-in-law is one’s wife’s mother or her female relatives; but what is meant here is her mother, because the other female relatives are forbidden to him only temporarily. Thus, if he says, “You are to me like the back of your mother,” or her belly, hand, foot, nose, lip, or the like, he has pronounced ẓihār.

His words, “Or: ‘You are forbidden to me.’” If he says, “You are forbidden to me,” he has pronounced ẓihār. We have previously discussed this issue in detail. According to the madhhab, it constitutes ẓihār in every case, even if he intended divorce or an oath.

The correct view, however, is that the matter requires distinction:

First: if he says, “You are forbidden to me,” then the basic ruling is that it is an oath. Since its basic ruling is that of an oath, it takes the ruling of an oath: he must offer the expiation for an oath, after which she becomes lawful to him. The evidence for this is Allah’s saying: “O Prophet, why do you prohibit what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking to please your wives? And Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful. Allah has already prescribed for you the absolution of your oaths.” [al-Tahrim 66:1–2] A wife is among that which Allah has made lawful for him; therefore, if he declares her forbidden to himself, it is an oath. The view adopted by the author and other jurists is undoubtedly weak. This is why it is authentically reported from Ibn Abbas that whoever declares his wife forbidden to himself has made an oath for which he must offer expiation. (1)

(1) Reported by Muslim in The Book of Divorce, chapter: The obligation of expiation upon one who declares his wife forbidden to himself without intending divorce, no. 1473 (19).
تعالى: ﴿وَرَبَائِبُكُمُ اللاَّتِي فِي حُجُورِكُمْ مِنْ نِسَائِكُمُ اللَاَّّتِي دَخَلْتُمْ بِهِنَّ﴾ [النساء: ٢٣]، فإذا قال لزوجته: أنت عليَّ كبنتك من فلان، فهو مظاهر؛ لأنه شبهها بمن تحرم عليه بالصهر، وإذا قال: أنت عليّ كظهر ابنتك مني فهو مظاهر؛ لأنه شبهها بمن تحرم عليه بالنسب. وقوله: «حماتي» الحماة أم الزوجة، أو قريباتها، لكن هنا يقصد أمها؛ لأن باقي القريبات تحرم عليه إلى أمد، فإذا قال: أنت علي كظهر أمك أو بطنها، أو يدها، أو رجلها أو أنفها أو شفتها، أو ما أشبه ذلك فهو مظاهر. قوله: «أو أنت علي حرام» إذا قال: أنت عليّ حرام، فهو مظاهر، وقد سبق لنا في هذه المسألة تفصيل، فالمذهب أنه ظهار في كل حال، ولو نوى الطلاق أو اليمين. والصواب أن في ذلك تفصيلاً: أولاً: إذا قال: أنت عليَّ حرام فالأصل أنه يمين، وإذا كان الأصل أنه يمين صار حكمه حكم اليمين، فيكفر كفارة يمين وتحل له، والدليل على هذا قول الله ﵎: ﴿يَاأَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ لِمَ تُحَرِّمُ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ لَكَ تَبْتَغِي مَرْضَاةَ أَزْوَاجِكَ وَاللَّهُ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ *﴾ ﴿قَدْ فَرَضَ اللَّهُ لَكُمْ تَحِلَّةَ أَيْمَانِكُمْ﴾ [التحريم: ١، ٢]، والزوجة مما أحل الله له، فإذا حرمها فهو يمين، وما ذهب إليه المؤلف وغيره من الفقهاء قول مرجوح بلا شك، ولهذا صح عن ابن عباس ﵄ أن من حرم زوجته فإنه يمين يكفرها (١).
(١) أخرجه مسلم في الطلاق/ باب وجوب الكفارة على مَنْ حرم امرأته ولم ينوِ الطلاق (١٤٧٣) (١٩).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies