Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

There remains a third category of women permanently forbidden in marriage which the author did not mention: those forbidden through marital affinity. The apparent meaning of the author’s words is that, if a man likens his wife to her mother, saying, “You are to me like the back of your mother,” this would not constitute ẓihār, since he said, “through lineage or suckling.” However, the author will later state that those forbidden through marital affinity are like those forbidden through suckling.

Thus, the principle is this: whoever likens his wife—or any part of her—to all or part of a woman permanently forbidden to him through lineage, suckling, or marital affinity has pronounced ẓihār.

His words, “the back”: this explains his words, “to a part of one who is forbidden to him.” Thus, he says, “You are to me like the back of my mother.”

His words, “or the belly”: such as saying, “You are to me like the belly of my mother.”

“Or another limb that is not detachable,” by saying to her, “You are to me,” “with me,” or “from me,” “like the back of my mother,” “or like the hand of my sister,” “or the face of my mother-in-law,” and the like; or, “You are forbidden to me,” or, “like carrion or blood”—then he has pronounced ẓihār. If she says this to her husband, however, it is not ẓihār, but she must offer its expiation. It is valid in the case of every wife.

His words, “or another limb that is not detachable”: such as the hand, foot, or finger. Thus, if he says, “You are to me like the hair of my mother’s head,” he has not pronounced ẓihār, because hair is treated as detachable; once it has separated from her, it has no legal ruling.

His words, “by saying to her: ‘You are to me,’ ‘with me,’ or ‘from me,’ ‘like the back of my mother,’ ‘or like the hand of my sister,’ ‘or the face of my mother-in-law,’ and the like.”

Prohibition through marital affinity is like prohibition through suckling and lineage. Thus, likening one’s wife to a woman forbidden through marital affinity is like likening her to one forbidden through lineage or suckling. The women forbidden to a husband through marital affinity are his wife’s mother, however far ascending, and her daughter, however far descending, on the condition that he has consummated the marriage with her mother, as indicated by His words:

بقي صنف ثالث من المحرمات على التأبيد ما ذكره المؤلف، وهو المحرمات بالصهر، فظاهر كلام المؤلف أنه لو شبه زوجته بأمها، فقال: أنت علي كظهر أمك، فظاهر كلامه أنه ليس بظهار؛ لأنه قال: «بنسب أو رضاع» ولكن سيأتي في كلام المؤلف أن المحرمات بالصهر كالمحرمات بالرضاع. إذاً القاعدة: من شبه زوجته أو بعضها ببعض أو بكل من تحرم عليه تحريماً مؤبداً بنسب أو رضاع أو مصاهرة فهو مظاهر. وقوله: «من ظهر» هذا بيان لقوله: «ببعض من تحرم عليه» فيقول: أنت عليَّ كظهر أمي. وقوله: «أو بطن» كأن يقول: أنت علي كبطن أمي. أَوْ عُضْوٍ آخَرَ لَا يَنْفَصِلُ، بِقَوْلِهِ لَهَا: أَنْتِ عَلَيَّ، أَوْ مَعِي، أَوْ مِنِّي كَظَهْرِ أَمِّي، أَوْ كَيَدِ أُخْتِي، أَوْ وَجْهِ حَمَاتِي وَنَحْوِهِ، أَوْ أَنْتِ عَلَيَّ حَرَامٌ، أَوْ كَالْمَيْتَةِ وَالدَّمِ فَهُوَ مُظَاهِرٌ، وَإِنْ قَالَتْهُ لِزَوْجِهَا فَلَيْسَ بِظِهَارٍ، وَعَلَيْهَا كَفَّارَتُهُ. وَيَصِحُّ مِنْ كُلِّ زَوْجَةٍ. قوله: «أو عضو آخر لا ينفصل» مثل اليد والرجل والأصبع، فلو قال: أنت علي كشعر رأس أمي، فليس مظاهراً؛ لأن الشعر في حكم المنفصل، وإذا انفصل عنها فليس له حكم. قوله: «بقوله لها: أنت عليَّ أو معي أو مني كظهر أمي، أو كيد أختي، أو وجه حماتي ونحوه». التحريم بالمصاهرة كالتحريم بالرضاع والنسب، فيكون التشبيه بالمُحرَّمة بالمصاهرة، كالتشبيه بالمُحرَّمة من النسب والرضاع، والمحرمات بالصهر على الزوج أم زوجته وإن علت، وبنتها وإن نزلت، لكن بشرط أن يكون قد دخل بأمها؛ لقوله

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies