Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Section

If he says, “If you menstruate, then you are divorced,” she is divorced at the onset of the first menstruation that is certainly established. If he says, “If you menstruate one full menstrual period,” she is divorced at the beginning of purity following a complete menstrual period. And if he says, “If you menstruate half a menstrual period,” she is divorced halfway through her customary menstrual duration.

In this section, the author discusses making divorce contingent upon menstruation—its beginning, its end, and partway through it. When our Shaykh (1), may Allah have mercy on him, reached this passage, he would skip over it, saying: “They are all merely examples.” Yet we read it, since an important issue may occasionally arise.

His statement, “If he says: ‘If you menstruate, then you are divorced,’ she is divorced at the onset of the first menstruation that is certainly established”: although this divorce is prohibited and an innovated form of divorce, the established school holds that an innovated divorce takes effect. It has previously been mentioned that the correct view is that it does not take effect.

His statement, “If you menstruate one full menstrual period, she is divorced at the beginning of purity following a complete menstrual period”: this is clear, because he said, “If you menstruate one menstrual period.”

His statement, “And if he says: ‘If you menstruate half a menstrual period,’ she is divorced halfway through her customary menstrual duration” (2).

(1) Shaykh, the eminent scholar Abd al-Rahman ibn Nasir al-Sa'di (may Allah have mercy on him; d. 1376 AH). (2) He states in Al-Rawd: “He may divorce her while she is in a state of purity, halfway through her customary cycle, because legal rulings are linked to customary patterns; thus, the occurrence of divorce is linked to it. However, once a full, established menstrual period has passed, it becomes clear that it occurred halfway through it, since the halfway point can only be known after the whole has occurred.” Al-Rawd al-Murabba with Ibn Qasim’s marginal notes, 6:559.
فَصْلٌ إِذَا قَالَ: إِنْ حِضْتِ فَأَنْتِ طَالِقٌ طَلَقَتْ بِأَوَّلِ حَيْضٍ مُتَيَقَّنٍ، وَإِذَا حِضْتِ حَيْضَةً تَطْلُقُ بِأَوَّلِ الطُّهْرِ مِنْ حَيْضَةٍ كَامِلَةٍ، وَفِي: إِذَا حِضْتِ نِصْفَ حَيْضَةٍ تَطْلُقُ فِي نِصْفِ عَادَتِهَا. هذا الفصل ذكر فيه المؤلف تعليق الطلاق بالحيض، بأوله وبآخره وبأثنائه؛ وكان شيخنا (١) ﵀ إذا وصلناها تجاوزناها؛ لأنه يقول: كلها أمثلة لكن نحن نقرؤها؛ لأنه ربما تعرض مسألة مهمة. قوله: «إذا قال: إن حضت فأنت طالق طلقت بأول حيض متيقن» مع أن هذا الطلاق حرام وبدعة، لكن المذهب يرون أن الطلاق البدعي يقع، وسبق أن الصحيح أنه لا يقع. قوله: «وإذا حضت حيضة تطلق بأول الطهر من حيضة كاملة» واضح؛ لأنه قال: إذا حضت حيضة. قوله: «وفي: إذا حضت نصف حيضة تطلق في نصف عادتها» (٢).
(١) الشيخ العلامة عبد الرحمن بن ناصر السعدي ﵀ (ت ١٣٧٦ هـ). (٢) قال في الروض: «تطلق طاهراً في نصف عادتها؛ لأن الأحكام تتعلق بالعادة، فتعلق بها وقوع الطلاق، لكن إذا مضت حيضة مستقرة تبينا وقوعه في نصفها؛ لأن النصف لا يعرف إلا بوجود الجميع». الروض المربع مع حاشية ابن قاسم (٦/ ٥٥٩).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies