Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

divorced.” The number of divorces takes effect according to the number of times it is said. Thus, if he says, “I intended the second to emphasize the first,” we say: This is not valid. But if he says, “I intended the third to emphasize the second,” it is valid.

His statement, “or with ‘so’”: if he says, “You are divorced, so divorced,” two divorces take effect.

His statement, “Or if he says after it, before it, or along with it: ‘a divorce,’ two divorces take effect”: that is, if he says, “You are divorced; after it is a divorce,” or, “You are divorced; before it is a divorce,” or, “You are divorced; along with it is a divorce,” two divorces take effect.

In summary: when he repeats the wording, the repetition is either joined by a coordinating particle or not. If it is joined by a coordinating particle, the number of divorces corresponding to the number of repetitions takes effect. If it is not joined by a coordinating particle, then, if he repeats the entire sentence, the number of divorces corresponding to the number of repetitions takes effect; but if he repeats only the predicate, one divorce takes effect unless he intends more.

His statement, “If he has not consummated the marriage with her”: or if he has not been in seclusion with her.

His statement, “She is irrevocably separated by the first, and what follows it does not become binding upon him”: this irrevocable divorce is not a major irrevocable separation, in which she is not lawful for him until after marriage to another husband. Rather, it is a minor irrevocable separation: she does not become lawful for him again except through a new marriage contract.

An example of this is a man who has contracted marriage with a woman, then a disagreement arises between him and her guardian. He says, in the same sitting, “You are divorced, then divorced.” One divorce takes effect, and he has no right to take her back. The reason is that, when he uttered the first sentence—“You are divorced”—she became divorced, so the second sentence encountered her as irrevocably separated. For when he divorces her before consummation and seclusion, she becomes divorced the moment he says, “You are divorced,”

طالق، يقع الطلاق بعدده، فلو قال: أردت توكيد الأولى بالثانية قلنا: لا يصح، ولو قال: أردت توكيد الثانية بالثالثة يصح. وقوله: «أو بالفاء» بأن قال: أنت طالق فطالق وقع اثنتان. قوله: «أو قال بعدها أو قبلها أو معها طلقة وقع اثنتان» أي قال: أنت طالق بعدها طلقة، أو أنت طالق قبلها طلقة، أو أنت طالق معها طلقة يقع اثنتان. والخلاصة: إذا كرر اللفظ فإما أن يكون التكرار بعطف، أو بغير عطف، فإن كان بعطف وقع بعدده، وإن كان بغير عطف، فإن كرر الجملة كلها وقع بعدده، وإن كرر الخبر فقط وقع واحدة ما لم ينوِ أكثر. قوله: «وإن لم يدخل بها» أو لم يخل بها. قوله: «بانت بالأولى ولم يلزمه ما بعدها» هذا الطلاق البائن ليس بينونة كبرى لا تحل له إلا بعد زوج، لكنها بينونة صغرى لا تحل له إلا بعقد. مثال ذلك: إنسان عقد على امرأة، وصار بينه وبين وليها سوء تفاهم، فقال: أنت طالق ثم طالق في نفس المجلس، فتطلق واحدة وليس له عليها رجعة؛ والسبب أنه لما قال الجملة الأولى: أنت طالق طلقت فصادفتها الجملة الثانية بائناً؛ لأنه إذا طلقها قبل الدخول والخلوة، فبمجرد ما يقول: أنت طالق تطلق،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies