Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, instructing Ibn Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, to take her back would amount to an instruction to increase the number of divorces. For if he takes her back and we count the first pronouncement as one divorce, he will then pronounce a second divorce, thereby increasing the number. Yet the Sacred Law favors reducing the number of divorces, not increasing it; this is why it prohibited more than one pronouncement. This is a very subtle point. It is as though he is saying: If the first divorce takes effect, then the Prophet’s instruction that he take her back and subsequently divorce her results in an increased number of divorces, whereas the Sacred Law does not favor a person repeatedly divorcing his wife. But according to the view that such a divorce does not take effect, do we say that it is recommended for him to take her back? No. We say: She is still his wife and has not become separated from her husband, such that we could say, “Take her back.”

“There is neither Sunnah-compliant nor innovated divorce in the case of a minor, a woman who no longer menstruates, a woman whose marriage has not been consummated, or a woman whose pregnancy has become apparent …”

His statement, “There is neither Sunnah-compliant nor innovated divorce in the case of a minor, a woman who no longer menstruates, a woman whose marriage has not been consummated, or a woman whose pregnancy has become apparent,” refers to four categories of women whose divorce is neither described as Sunnah-compliant nor as innovated. A minor is one who has not yet menstruated, even if she has reached twenty years of age, due to Allah’s saying: “and those who have not menstruated” [65:4]. This is unrestricted.

A woman who no longer menstruates is one who no longer expects menstruation—that is, it has ceased for her and she does not expect it to return. According to the author’s view mentioned previously in the chapter on menstruation, this is at the age of fifty, since menstruation after fifty is not considered anything, as this is what generally and customarily occurs, and rare cases carry no ruling. We respond to them by citing Allah’s saying: “They ask you about menstruation. Say, ‘It is a harm’” [2:222]. Whenever this harm is present, it is menstruation. Whether it is rare or common is of no consequence; so long as it is present, it is regarded as menstruation. The correct view, therefore, is that it is not restricted to a particular age.

النبي ﷺ ابن عمر ﵄ بالمراجعة أمراً بتكثير الطلاق؛ لأنه إذا راجعها وحسبنا الطلقة الأولى واحدة، فسيطلق طلقة ثانية فيزيد العدد، والشرع يحب أن ينقص عدد الطلاق لا أن يزيد، ولهذا حرم ما زاد على الواحدة، وهذا معنى لطيف جداً، فكأنه يقول: إذا كان الطلاق الأول واقعاً، فكون الرسول ﷺ يأمره أن يراجعها؛ ثم يطلق فيزداد عليه عدد الطلاق، والشرع لا يحب من المرء أن يتكرر طلاقه، وعلى القول بأن الطلاق لا يقع هل نقول: تسن رجعتها؟ لا، نقول: هي زوجة لم تنفك عن زوجها حتى نقول: راجعها. وَلَا سُنَّةَ وَلَا بِدْعَةَ لِصَغِيرَةٍ، وَآيِسَةٍ، وَغَيْرِ مَدْخُولٍ بِهَا، وَمَنْ بَانَ حَمْلُهَا، ........................... قوله: «ولا سنة ولا بدعة لصغيرة وآيسة، غير مدخول بها ومن بان حملها» هذه أربع نساء ليس لطلاقهن سنة ولا بدعة، أي: لا يوصف طلاقهن بسنة ولا بدعة، فالصغيرة وهي من لم يأتها الحيض، حتى لو بلغت عشرين سنة لقول الله ﵎: ﴿وَاللَاَّّئِي لَمْ يَحِضْنَ﴾ [الطلاق: ٤] وهذا مطلق. والآيسة هي التي لا ترجو الحيض، يعني انقطع عنها ولا ترجو رجوعه، وسِنُّها على كلام المؤلف الذي مضى في باب الحيض خمسون سنة؛ لأن الحيض بعد الخمسين ليس بشيء؛ لأن هذا هو الغالب المعتاد، والنادر لا حكم له، فنرد عليهم بأن الله يقول: ﴿وَيَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ الْمَحِيْضِ قُلْ هُوَ أَذىً﴾ [البقرة: ٢٢٢]، فمتى وجد هذا الأذى فهو حيض، أما كون هذا نادراً أو غير نادر فلا يهم، فما دام وجد فإنه يعتبر حيضاً، فالصواب أنها لا تتقيد بسن.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies