whether little or much. Thus, it is general in respect of what she gives as ransom—its type, kind, amount, and manner.
Others said: He may not take more than he gave her, because His saying, “There is no blame upon either of them concerning that by which she ransoms herself,” refers back to what preceded it. For He says: “It is not lawful for you to take back anything of what you have given them, unless both fear that they cannot keep within the bounds set by Allah. But if you fear that they cannot keep within the bounds set by Allah, then there is no blame upon either of them concerning that by which she ransoms herself” [al-Baqarah 2:229]—that is, only from what you had given them. Also, the Messenger of Allah, may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, forbade Thabit ibn Qays, may Allah be pleased with him, from taking more in his khulʿ, saying to him: “Take back the garden, but do not take more.” (1)
Moreover, any amount beyond what he gave her is wrongful consumption of wealth, since it is not received in exchange for anything. Yes, whatever she took from him, he has the right to recover; but as for what exceeds that, what is it in exchange for?
Those who held it permissible replied to the hadith by saying that it is weak, and, as is well known, a weak hadith cannot serve as proof. Even assuming it to be authentic, it is by way of guidance and counsel, for there is no doubt that it is unseemly for a husband to demand more than he gave her. The man made her intimacy lawful for himself, enjoyed her, and occupied her; then, in the end, he says, “I want more than the dowry.” Decency does not permit this.
They also replied to the claim that taking more than he gave her is taking wealth without right, saying: Rather, he takes it by right, because this man owns this woman