Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

His servants. Such a man does not love this wife and says, “My wealth cannot simply go to waste.” So he makes things difficult for her, withholds her rights, and abandons her in bed in order to make her ransom herself from him. We say: This is unlawful for you, because Allah has forbidden it.

His statement, “and this is not due to her unlawful sexual conduct”: if it is due to something other than her actual fornication, such as her being overly free in speaking with young men, talking on the telephone, and the like, should we say that this is bad conduct which permits him to pressure her into ransoming herself from him?

Yes. We understand his statement, “her unlawful sexual conduct,” to include the fornication of speech, sight, hearing, touching, and walking, as the Messenger, may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him, informed us: “The eye commits fornication, the ear commits fornication, the hand commits fornication, and the foot commits fornication.” (1) Thus, if this man says, “I cannot bear to remain with this woman while she is in such a state,” and he makes things difficult for her so that she will ransom herself from him, this is permissible.

If someone were to say: Allah says, “unless they commit a clear immorality,” whereas speaking or looking are not among immoralities, we reply: These are means that lead to immoralities. Moreover, many people possess protective jealousy and cannot tolerate their wives speaking with men or conversing with them.

But if he were to pressure her because of her unlawful sexual conduct, yet she offered no compensation and was unconcerned, is it permissible for him to keep her while she remains in this state?

(1) Narrated by al-Bukhari, in al-Istidhan (Seeking Permission), chapter: “The adultery of the limbs apart from the private parts” (6243); and Muslim, in al-Qadar (Divine Decree), chapter: “The share of adultery and other matters decreed for the son of Adam” (2657), on the authority of Abu Hurayrah, may Allah be pleased with him.
الخلق، ما أحب هذه الزوجة، وقال: لا يمكن مالي يذهب هدراً، وصار يضيق عليها، ويمنعها حقها، ويهجرها في المضجع؛ من أجل أن تفتدي منه، نقول: هذا حرام عليك؛ لأن الله نهى عنه. وقوله: «ولم يكن لزناها» فإذا كان لغير زناها، لكن لتوسعها في مخاطبة الشباب، تتكلم في الهاتف، وما أشبه ذلك، فهل نقول: إن هذا من سوء الخلق الذي يبيح له أن يعضلها لتفتدي منه؟ نعم، ونجعل قوله: «لزناها» شاملاً لزنا النطق، والنظر، والسمع، والبطش، والمشي، كما أخبر الرسول ﵊ «أن العين تزني، والأذن تزني، واليد تزني، والرجل تزني» (١)، فهذا الرجل يقول: ما أصبر على هذه المرأة، وهي بهذه الحال، فصار يضيق عليها لتفتدي منه، فهذا جائز. فإن قال قائل: إن الله يقول: ﴿إِلاَّ أَنْ يَأْتِينَ بِفَاحِشَةٍ مُبَيِّنَةٍ﴾ والكلام أو النظر ليس من الفواحش، فنقول: إن هذا وسيلة إلى الفواحش، ثم إن كثيراً من الناس يكون عنده غَيْرة، أن تخاطب امرأته الرجال، أو أن تتحدث إليهم. ولكن إذا قدر أنه عضلها لزناها فلم تبذل، ولم يهمها، فهل يجوز أن يبقيها عنده على هذه الحال؟
(١) أخرجه البخاري في الاستئذان/ باب زنا الجوارح دون الفرج (٦٢٤٣)؛ ومسلم في القدر/ باب قُدِّر على ابن آدم حظه من الزنا وغيره (٢٦٥٧) عن أبي هريرة ﵁.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies