Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

educated, religious, and a virgin, while the husband is poor, the dowry is assessed according to the wife’s circumstances, because it is compensation for her marital rights.

His statement, “If they agree upon it before that, it is permissible,” means that if they agree on it without referring the matter to the judge, the right belongs to them both; that is, there is no harm in it. Thus, if they say, “We will not go to the qadi; rather, we will reach an agreement between ourselves,” and the husband says, “The dowry is one thousand,” while she says, “Rather, it is two thousand,” and some people intervene and say, “One thousand five hundred,” or something similar, there is no objection, because the right extends no further than the two of them.

It is valid for her to waive her entitlement to the customary dowry before it is assessed. If either of them dies before consummation and assessment, the other inherits from the deceased, and she is entitled to the customary dowry of women like her.

His statement, “It is valid for her to waive her entitlement to the customary dowry before it is assessed.” (1)

His statement, “If either of them dies,” means either of the spouses.

His statement, “before consummation,” means intercourse; valid seclusion is treated as equivalent to it.

His statement, “and assessment,” means the assessment of the customary dowry.

His statement, “the other inherits from the deceased, and she is entitled to the customary dowry of women like her”: Suppose that a man contracts marriage with a woman whose dowry has been left unspecified, whether the delegation concerns the marital right itself or the dowry, and then he dies. In this case, we ask about three matters:

First: Is she entitled to a dowry?

Second: Does she inherit?

Third: Must she observe a waiting period?

(1) The Shaykh did not explain it. Al-Rawd al-Murbi states: “Because it is a right belonging to her, she may choose either to retain it or to waive it” (6/398).
متعلمة، ديِّنة، بكراً، والزوج فقير، فيفرض المهر على حسب حال الزوجة؛ لأنه عوض عن بضعها. قوله: «وإن تراضيا قبله جاز» أي: إن اتفقا عليه بدون الرجوع إلى الحاكم فالحق لهما، أي: لا بأس، فلو قالا: لن نذهب إلى القاضي، ونتفق فيما بيننا، فقال الزوج: المهر ألف، وقالت هي: بل ألفان، وتوسط أناس وقالوا: ألف وخمسمائة، وما أشبه ذلك، فلا حرج؛ لأن الحق لا يعدوهما. وَيَصِحُّ إِبْرَاؤُهَا مِنْ مَهْرِ المِثلِ قَبْلَ فَرْضِهِ، وَمَنْ مَاتَ مِنْهُمَا قَبْلَ الإِصَابَةِ وَالفَرْضِ وَرِثَهُ الآخَرُ، وَلَهَا مَهْرُ نِسَائِهَا، .......... قوله: «ويصح إبراؤها من مهر المثل قبل فرضه» (١). قوله: «ومن مات منهما» أي: من الزوجين. قوله: «قبل الإصابة» أي: الجماع، والخلوة ملحقة به. قوله: «والفرض» أي: فرض مهر المثل. قوله: «ورثه الآخر، ولها مهر نسائها»، فلو فرضنا أن رجلاً عقد على امرأة مفوضة، سواء تفويض بضع، أو مهر، ثم مات، فهنا نسأل عن ثلاثة أشياء: الأول: هل يجب لها مهر؟ الثاني: هل لها ميراث؟ الثالث: هل تجب عليها عدة؟
(١) لم يتعرض الشيخ ﵀ لشرحها، قال في الروض المربع: لأنه حق لها، فهي مخيرة بين إبقائه وإسقاطه (٦/ ٣٩٨).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies