Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

His statement, “or by evidence of his admission,” means that he denies it, but we have evidence against him from witnesses who testify that he previously admitted that he was impotent. His impotence is then established. What, then, is the ruling in his case?

The answer is in his statement, “He is granted a year from the time they bring their case before the judge.” He is given a year from the time of litigation. What is meant here by a year is a lunar year, not a solar year, because this is the type of year specified in the Quran:

“He is the One Who made the sun a radiant light and the moon a reflected light, and determined for it phases, so that you may know the number of years and the reckoning.” [Yunus: 5]

Thus, Allah made clear that years are lunar years. He also says:

“They ask you about the new moons. Say, ‘They are measures of time for people.’” [al-Baqarah: 189]

Is there any difference between a lunar year and a solar year? Yes. The solar year is longer, because it is connected to the zodiacal constellations, which are twelve constellations, and its days are longer than those of the lunar year. What matters, then, is that it is a lunar year; the periods granted to those suffering from impotence are determined accordingly.

His statement, “from the time they bring their case before the judge,” means not from the time of the marriage, nor from the time the claim is made. Thus, if she brings a claim against him, for example, in Muharram, but they do not bring their case before the judge until Rabiʿ, the period begins from Rabiʿ.

His statement, “He is granted a year,” means that it is the Islamic judge who grants him this period.

His statement, “If he has intercourse with her during it, otherwise she may annul the marriage,” means that if the husband has intercourse with her during this period, she has no right to annul the marriage, because it becomes clear that he is not impotent. Otherwise, she may annul it.

قوله: «أو ببينة على إقراره» أنكر لكن عندنا عليه بينة تشهد بأنه أقر من قبل بأنه عنين، فتثبت العنة، فما الحكم فيه؟ الجواب قوله: «أجل سنة منذ تحاكمه» يؤجل سنة منذ التحاكم، والمراد بالسنة هنا الهلالية لا الفصلية؛ لأنها هي التي نص عليها القرآن: ﴿هُوَ الَّذِي جَعَلَ الشَّمْسَ ضِيَاءً وَالْقَمَرَ نُورًا وَقَدَّرَهُ مَنَازِلَ﴾ ﴿لِتَعْلَمُوا عَدَدَ السِّنِينَ وَالْحِسَابَ﴾ [يونس: ٥]، فبيَّن الله ﷾ أن السنين هي السنين الهلالية، وقال تعالى: ﴿يَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ الأَهِلَّةِ قُلْ هِيَ مَوَاقِيتُ لِلنَّاسِ﴾ [البقرة: ١٨٩]، وهل هناك فرق بين الهلالية والفصلية؟ نعم، الفصلية أطول؛ لأن الفصلية متعلقة بالبروج، والبروج اثنا عشر برجاً، وأيامها أطول من أيام الهلالية، فالمهم أنها سنة هلالية، فتوقَّت بها الآجال لمن فيه عُنة. وقوله: «منذ تحاكمه» لا منذ الزواج، ولا منذ الدعوى، فلو ادعت عليه ـ مثلاً ـ في محرم، ولم يتحاكما إلا في ربيع، فالمدة من ربيع. وقوله: «أجل سنة» المؤجل له الحاكم الشرعي. قوله: «فإن وطئ فيها وإلا فلها الفسخ» إن وطئ الزوج في هذه المدة فلا فسخ لها؛ لأنه تبين أنه ليس بعنين وإلا فلها الفسخ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies