Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

[al-Baqarah: 235].

We therefore say that the marriage is invalid, because it is prohibited by the explicit text of the Quran, and that which has been prohibited cannot be validated.

But if the waiting period ends, may he then marry her? Should we say that the impediment has ceased, and that once the impediment has ceased she becomes lawful for him? Or should we say that she is forbidden to him as a discretionary disciplinary punishment, because he sought to obtain something before its due time by unlawful means, and should therefore be punished by being deprived of it?

The majority of scholars hold that she becomes lawful for him through a new marriage contract. Umar ibn al-Khattab—may Allah be pleased with him—held that he should be barred from her and not permitted to marry her, even after the waiting period (1), as a deterrent to him and to others as well. This was among his wise policies.

The correct view in this matter is that it is left to the judge’s ruling. If he considers it beneficial to bar the man from marrying her, then he should do so, following the example of Umar ibn al-Khattab—may Allah be pleased with him—and by analogy with the case where a beneficiary under a will kills the testator: the beneficiary is deprived of the bequest. Thus, if a man bequeaths one thousand riyals, and the beneficiary kills him in order to take the thousand, we say: We deprive you of it, because you sought to obtain something before its due time by unlawful means. Thus, the correct view in this matter is that it is left to the judge’s discretion, and the cases before a judge undoubtedly vary. If people were to persist in proposing to women in their waiting periods and marrying them, then barring such marriages and prohibiting the man who concluded the contract from marrying her becomes necessary.

His statement, “and a woman undergoing istibrāʾ (establishing that her womb is clear) due to another man”: a woman undergoing istibrāʾ is one for whom a waiting period is not intended; rather, what is intended is to establish that her womb is clear. According to the stronger view, this includes a woman divorced through khulʿ (divorce initiated by the wife in return for compensation). In the case of khulʿ, her period of waiting is not intended as an ʿiddah (waiting period); rather, its purpose is

(1) Reported by Malik (2:536).
أَجَلَهُ﴾ [البقرة: ٢٣٥] فنقول: النكاح باطل؛ لأنه منهي عنه بنص القرآن، ولا يمكن تصحيح المنهي عنه. لكن لو انقضت العدة فهل له أن يتزوجها، ونقول: إنه زال المانع، وإذا زال المانع حلت، أو نقول: يحرم إياها تعزيراً؛ لأنه تعجل الشيء قبل أوانه على وجه محرم، فيعاقب بحرمانه؟ جمهور العلماء على أنها تحل له بعقد، وذهب عمر بن الخطاب ﵁ أنه يمنع منها، ولا يزوج إياها، حتى بعد العدة (١)؛ تنكيلاً له ولغيره أيضاً، وهذا من سياساته الحكيمة. والصحيح في هذه المسألة أنه راجع إلى حكم الحاكم، فإن رأى من المصلحة أن يمنعه منها فليفعل تأسياً بعمر بن الخطاب ﵁، وقياساً على ما لو قتل الموصى له الموصي، فإن الموصى له يحرم من الوصية، فلو أوصى رجل بألف ريال، فقام الموصى له وقتله من أجل أن يأخذ الألف، فإننا نقول: نمنعك منها؛ لأنك تعجلت الشيء قبل أوانه على وجه محرم، فالصحيح في هذه المسألة أنه يرجع إلى رأي الحاكم، والحاكم لا شك أن الأمور عنده تختلف، فلو تتابع الناس على خطبة المعتدات ونكاحهن، فهنا يتعين المنع، والتحريم على العاقد. قوله: «والمستبرأة من غيره» المستبرأة هي من لا يراد منها العدة، وإنما يراد معرفة براءة رحمها، ومنها على القول الراجح المخالعة، فالمخالعة لا يقصد من تربصها أن تعتد، وإنما يقصد
(١) أخرجه مالك (٢/ ٥٣٦).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies