Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

The same applies to His statement: “Do not marry those women whom your fathers married.” It is well known that a foster-father is never included in the unqualified term “father”; he is called a father only when qualified as a foster-father.

As for His statement, “the wives of your sons,” it may serve as an argument against them, for Allah qualified the sons as being from one’s own loins, saying: “the wives of your sons who are from your own loins.” They reply that this qualification excludes an adopted son. It is then said: Allah would not need in the Quran to exclude a son who is not recognized by the Sacred Law, for such a son is not included in the first place and thus requires no qualification to exclude him. An adopted son is not legally a son at all.

Accordingly, the verse supports the view chosen by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, which is the view we hold and regard as stronger: breastfeeding has no effect on marriage relations by affinity. This is because we have a general ruling in the Quran, which cannot be restricted except by clear evidence: “All beyond these are lawful for you.” The word “all” is a relative pronoun indicating generality. Thus, whenever someone says, “This woman is forbidden,” we say to him: Bring proof.

Accordingly, a man may marry his wife’s foster-mother, but only after he has separated from his wife through death or divorce; he may not be married to them both at the same time. This is due to the Prophet’s saying, peace and blessings be upon him: “Through breastfeeding, what is forbidden through lineage is also forbidden.” (1) Therefore, since marrying two sisters at once is forbidden through lineage, it is also forbidden through breastfeeding. Hence, Shaykh al-Islam, may Allah have mercy on him, was mistaken in this matter when he said that it is permissible to be married to two foster-sisters at once; and the fact that the majority of the Ummah

(1) Its source has been cited previously (p. 112).
كذلك قوله: ﴿وَلَا تَنْكِحُوا مَا نَكَحَ آبَاؤُكُمْ﴾ فإنه من المعلوم أن الأب من الرضاع لا يدخل في مطلق الأب أبداً، فلا يسمى أباً إلا بقيد الرضاع. وأما قوله: ﴿وَحَلَائِلُ أَبْنَائِكُمُ﴾ فقد تكون حجة عليهم؛ لأن الله قيد الأبناء بكونهم من الأصلاب؛ فقال: ﴿وَحَلَائِلُ أَبْنَائِكُمُ الَّذِينَ مِنْ أَصْلَابِكُمْ﴾ وأجابوا: أن هذا القيد احتراز من ابن التبني، فيقال: إنه لا يمكن أن يحترز الله في القرآن عن ابن باطل شرعاً؛ لأن الابن الباطل شرعاً غير داخل حتى يحتاج إلى قيد يخرجه، فابن التبني ليس شرعياً من الأصل. وعلى هذا فالآية تدل على ما اختاره شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية ﵀، وهو الذي نراه ونرجحه أنه لا دخل للرضاع في المصاهرة؛ وذلك لأن لدينا عموماً من القرآن فلا يمكن أن نخرمه إلا بدليل بَيِّن، وهو قوله: ﴿وَأُحِلَّ لَكُمْ مَا وَرَاءَ ذَلِكُمْ﴾ و «ما» اسم موصول تفيد العموم، فأي إنسان يقول: هذه المرأة حرام، نقول له: ائت بدليل. وعلى هذا يجوز للرجل أن يتزوج أم زوجته من الرضاعة، لكن بعد أن يفارق الزوجة بموت أو طلاق فلا يجمع بينهما؛ لقول الرسول ﵊ «يحرم بالرضاعة ما يحرم بالنسب» (١)، فإذا حرم الجمع بالنسب حرم بالرضاعة، ولهذا فشيخ الإسلام ﵀ في هذه المسألة لم يصب في قوله إنه يجوز الجمع بين الأختين من الرضاع، وكون جمهور الأمة
(١) سبق تخريجه ص (١١٢).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies