Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

say, “I marry you,” or, “I give you in marriage,” even though he is not an Arab and does not know the meaning of “I marry you” or “I give you in marriage,” then he may say it in his own language, because the precise wording is not itself an act of worship. This differs from the Noble Quran. If someone wished to recite the Noble Quran in his own language, even with an exactly corresponding meaning, we would say to him: No; for the Quran is the speech of Allah and cannot be altered, and because its recitation is itself an act of worship.

His statement, “for one who knows Arabic, unless the words ‘I marry you’ or ‘I give you in marriage’ are used”: thus, he might say, for example, “I marry you to my daughter,” or, “I give you my daughter in marriage.” If he says, “I join you to my daughter in marriage,” it is not valid according to the legal school, because he knows Arabic; he must say, “I marry you,” using the word beginning with the letter zāy.

If he says, “I make you the owner of my daughter,” it is not valid, because the wording must be “I marry you” or “I give you in marriage.”

What is the proof that it is valid only with these two expressions? There is no proof—neither in the Quran nor in the sunnah—that a marriage is valid only with this wording. Yet they say: because these are the two expressions used in the Quran. In the Noble Quran, Allah says:

“Marry those women who are lawful for you.” [al-Nisāʾ 4:3]

“Then, when Zayd had no further need of her, We gave her to you in marriage.” [al-Aḥzāb 33:37]

Thus, the two terms used in the Quran are marriage and giving in marriage, so we should not go beyond them, but confine ourselves to the expressions that have been transmitted. This is due to the gravity of marriage: it is the gravest and most demanding of contracts. There is no doubt, however, that this reasoning is infirm—indeed, dead.

The second view is that a contract may be concluded with any wording that is customarily understood to indicate it. The evidence for this is found in the Quran and the sunnah.

As for the Quran, Allah says:

“Marry those women who are lawful for you.” [al-Nisāʾ 4:3]

يقول: زوجت أو أنكحت وهو غير عربي، ولا يدري ما معنى زوجت أو أنكحت، فإنه يقولها بلغته؛ لأنه لا يتعبد بلفظه، بخلاف القرآن الكريم، فلو أراد أحد أن يتلو القرآن الكريم بلغته ولو بالمعنى المطابق قلنا له:، لا؛ لأن القرآن كلام الله، لا يمكن أن يغير، ولأنه يتعبد بتلاوته. وقوله: «ممن يحسن العربية بغير لفظ زوجت أو أنكحت» فيقول مثلاً: زوجتك بنتي، أو أنكحتك بنتي، فلو قال: جوزتك بنتي، لا يصح على المذهب؛ لأنه يحسن العربية، فلا بد أن يقول: زوجتك بتقديم الزاي. ولو قال: ملكتك بنتي لا يصح؛ لأنه لا بد أن يكون بلفظ زوَّجت أو أنكحت. وما الدليل على أنه لا يصح إلا بهذين اللفظين؟ ليس هناك دليل، لا في القرآن، ولا في السنة أنه لا يصح النكاح إلا بهذا اللفظ، لكن يقولون: لأنهما اللفظان اللذان ورد بهما القرآن، ففي القرآن الكريم: ﴿فَانْكِحُوا مَا طَابَ لَكُمْ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ﴾ [النساء: ٣]، ﴿فَلَمَّا قَضَى زَيْدٌ مِنْهَا وَطَرًا زَوَّجْنَاكَهَا﴾ [الأحزاب: ٣٧]، فاللفظان اللذان ورد بهما القرآن هما النكاح والزواج، فلا نتعداهما، فنقتصر على الألفاظ الواردة؛ وذلك لعظم خطر النكاح، فهو أعظم العقود خطراً وأشدها تحرياً، ولا شك أن هذا التعليل عليل، بل هو ميت. القول الثاني: أنه يجوز العقد بكل بلفظ يدل عليه عرفاً، والدليل من القرآن ومن السنة. من القرآن أن الله قال: ﴿فَانْكِحُوا مَا طَابَ لَكُمْ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ﴾ [النساء: ٣]،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies