Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

His words, “even if,” indicate a point of disagreement. The author means that one inherits from the other even if they differ in religion.

The second opinion is that there is no mutual inheritance between them, even though the right of clientage is established, because of the difference in religion. This is the stronger view: clientage is established, but there is no inheritance between them. The evidence is the Prophet’s saying, peace and blessings be upon him: “A Muslim does not inherit from a disbeliever, nor does a disbeliever inherit from a Muslim.” (1) Thus, the author, may Allah have mercy on him, by his words, “even if they differ in religion,” means that one inherits even where they differ in religion. We do not agree with him on this, for we have clear and explicit evidence. But do we agree with him that clientage is established? Yes, for clientage is established, and it is a bond like that of kinship.

His words, “Women do not inherit by clientage except from one whom they themselves emancipated, or from one emancipated by someone whom they emancipated,” mean that a woman inherits by clientage only from one whom she emancipated, or from one emancipated by someone whom she emancipated. She does not inherit by clientage through lineage.

For example, a son and a daughter purchase their father, and he consequently becomes free through them. The father then purchases a slave and emancipates him. They inherit from their father by kinship, because kinship takes precedence. Thus, for example, the daughter may have paid ten thousand toward the price of her father, while the son paid five thousand—that is, she paid twice as much. If the father dies, how do they inherit from him? The male receives the share of two females. If she says, “I contributed more than my brother toward purchasing my father,” we say: kinship takes precedence over clientage.

As for the slave emancipated by the father, if he dies, who inherits from him? The son inherits from him, because the daughter’s and the son’s inheritance from their father in the first case is inheritance by kinship, not inheritance by clientage. Consequently, the son inherits from him, while the daughter does not, because women—

(1) Its source has previously been cited on p. 302.
وقوله: «وإن» هذا إشارة خلاف، فالمؤلف يريد أنه يرث ولو مع اختلاف الدين. والقول الثاني: أنه لا توارث بينهما وإن ثبت الولاء؛ من أجل اختلاف الدين، وهذا القول هو الراجح أن الولاء ثابت ولكن لا توارث بينهما، ودليل ذلك قول النبي ﷺ: «لا يرث المسلم الكافر ولا الكافر المسلم» (١)، فقول المؤلف ﵀: «وإن اختلف دينهما» يريد أنه يرث ولو مع اختلاف الدين، ونحن لا نوافقه على ذلك؛ لأن لدينا دليلاً واضحاً صريحاً، لكن هل نوافقه على ثبوت الولاء؟ نعم؛ لأن الولاء ثابت، وهو لحمة كلحمة النسب. قوله: «ولا يرث النساء بالولاء إلا من أعتقْنَ أو أعتَقَه من أعتقن»، المرأة لا ترث بالولاء إلا من أعتَقَتْ أو أعتقه من أعتَقَتْ، فلا ترث بالولاء بواسطة النسب، مثال ذلك: ذكر وأنثى اشتريا أباهما ثم عتق عليهما، ثم إن الأب اشترى عبداً فأعتقه، فيرثان أباهما ميراث نسب؛ لأن النسب مقدم، فمثلاً البنت بذلت في قيمة والدها عشرة آلاف والابن بذل خمسة آلاف، يعني بذلت الضعفين فمات الأب، كيف يرثانه؟ للذكر مثل حظ الأنثيين، فلو قالت: أنا بذلت أكثر من أخي في شراء والدي، قلنا: النسب مقدم على الولاء، أما بالنسبة لعتيق الأب إذا مات، فمن يرثه؟ يرثه الابن؛ لأن ميراث البنت والابن في الأول ميراث نسب، ليس ميراث ولاء، وعليه فيرثه الابن ولا ترثه البنت؛ لأن النساء
(١) سبق تخريجه ص (٣٠٢).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies