Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

through breastfeeding, for example, this is a mistaken assumption concerning the marriage contract, because he entered into a contract believing it to be valid, while the other had intercourse believing it to be lawful. Thus, if she bears a child, that child inherits through two ties, and he is given inheritance through both ties because both causes exist. Whenever a cause exists, its legal consequence must be given effect.

It was also said that he inherits through the stronger of the two ties, receiving only one share of inheritance, because two opposing ties cannot coexist in one person. Since this is impossible, the stronger tie is taken, and he inherits through one tie only.

His statement, “There is no inheritance through marriage to a woman who is an unmarriageable blood relative”: an example is a man who marries a woman and then dies, after which it becomes clear that she was his sister through breastfeeding. Does she inherit? The answer is: she does not inherit, because it becomes clear that the marriage was invalid. Therefore, she does not inherit, even if she had remained with him for many years.

His statement, “Nor through a contract that would not be upheld if he embraced Islam,” means that there is no inheritance through a contract that would not be upheld if he embraced Islam. An example is when a Magian marries his sister and then dies while she is still his wife. If he were to embrace Islam, this marriage contract would not be upheld. This differs from a prohibited marriage contract whose cause of prohibition has ceased, in which case the contract is upheld. For example, if he marries his wife’s sister while he remains married to her sister, the marriage is invalid because a man may not be married to two sisters at once. But if, upon embracing Islam, he separates from the first wife, the marriage becomes valid because the impediment has ceased. Likewise, if he marries a woman during her waiting period, the marriage is invalid; but if he embraces Islam after her waiting period has ended, the marriage is upheld.

من الرضاعة ـ مثلاً ـ هذه شبهة عقد؛ لأنه عقد عقداً يظنه صحيحاً وذاك جامَع جماعاً يظنه صحيحاً، فإذا أتت بولد صار هذا الولد يرث بجهتين، فيوَرَّث بالجهتين؛ لوجود السببين، والشيء إذا وجد سببه وجب العمل به. وقيل: يرث بأقوى الجهتين ميراثاً واحداً؛ لأنه لا يمكن أن يجتمع في شخص واحد جهتان متقابلتان، وإذا كان لا يمكن فإنه يؤخذ بالأقوى ويرث بجهة واحدة. قوله: «ولا إرث بنكاح ذات رحم محرَّم» مثاله: إنسان تزوج امرأة ثم مات عنها، وبعد الموت تبين أنها أخته من الرضاعة، فهل ترث؟ الجواب: لا ترث؛ لأنه تبين أن النكاح باطل، فلا ترث حتى لو بقيت معه عدة سنين. قوله: «ولا بعقد لا يُقَرُّ عليه لو أسلم» يعني ولا إرث بعقد لا يقر عليه لو أسلم، مثاله: أن يتزوج المجوسي أخته ثم يموت عنها، فهذا العقد إذا أسلم لا يقر عليه، بخلاف ما لو كان عقد عقداً محرماً لكن زال سبب التحريم، فإنه يقر عليه، كما لو تزوج أخت زوجته والأخت معه فالنكاح لا يصح؛ لأنه لا يجمع بين أختين، لكن لو أنه حين أسلم فارق الأولى فالنكاح يصح؛ لأنه زال المانع، وكذلك لو نكح امرأة في عدتها فالنكاح باطل، ولكن لو أسلم بعد أن انقضت العدة فإنه يقر عليه.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies