Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

some of the intermediaries are excluded by others, apply that ruling.

For example, suppose a person dies leaving a daughter’s daughter, the daughter of a full brother, and the daughter of a maternal half-brother. Here, a group traces its connection through a group: three persons trace their connection through three persons. First divide the estate among the intermediaries, and assume that the deceased died leaving a daughter, a full brother, and a maternal half-brother. The daughter receives one-half, and the remainder goes to the full brother; the maternal half-brother is excluded by the daughter. Thus, we say: the daughter’s daughter receives one-half, the daughter of the full brother receives the remainder, and the daughter of the maternal half-brother receives nothing.

Thus, if one person traces his or her connection through one person, he or she receives that person’s share. If a group traces its connection through one person, they receive that person’s share, inheriting it as they would if that person himself had died. If a group traces its connection through a group, we first divide the estate among the intermediaries, then let those tracing their connection through them inherit as though the intermediaries had died leaving them. This completes the discussion of the inheritance of the distant kindred.

His statement, “The lines of relationship are paternal, maternal, and filial”: these are the lines of relationship among the distant kindred. In residuary inheritance, there are five such lines, but with respect to the distant kindred they have been made three. The scholars differ on this matter, because there are no detailed textual proofs concerning the distant kindred.

The paternal line includes everyone who comes through the father’s side. A maternal half-uncle falls under the paternal line because he is your father’s brother. Likewise, the son of your paternal grandmother falls under the paternal line, since he comes through your father’s side. A maternal uncle falls under the maternal line, because your connection to him is through the mother. The children of maternal half-siblings fall under the maternal line. The established school differs on this, holding that the children of maternal half-siblings fall under the paternal line,

سقط بعضهم، أي: بعض المدلى بهم ببعض عملت به، مثال ذلك: هلك هالك عن بنت بنت، وبنت أخ شقيق، وبنت أخ لأم، أدلى الآن جماعة بجماعة، ثلاثة أدلوا بثلاثة، اقسم المال بين المدلى بهم أولاً، وقَدِّر كأن الميت مات عن بنت وأخ شقيق وأخ لأم، للبنت النصف والباقي للأخ الشقيق، والأخ لأم تسقطه البنت، إذن نقول: لبنت البنت النصف، ولبنت الأخ الشقيق الباقي، ولا شيء لبنت الأخ لأم. إذاً إذا أدلى واحد بواحد فله نصيبه، وإذا أدلى جماعة بواحد فلهم نصيبه، يرثونه كما يرثونه لو كان هو الميت، وإذا أدلى جماعة بجماعة فإننا نقسم المال أولاً بين المدلى بهم، ثم نورث المدلين كأن المدلى بهم ماتوا عنهم، وبهذا تم ميراث ذوي الأرحام. قوله: «والجهات أبوة، وأمومة، وبنوة»، هذه جهات ذوي الأرحام، وفي التعصيب الجهات خمسة، لكن في ذوي الأرحام جعلوها ثلاثة على اختلاف بين العلماء في هذا؛ لأن ذوي الأرحام لا يوجد فيه نصوص تفصيلية. فالأبوة يدخل فيها كل من يأتي من قبل الأب، العم لأم من جهة الأبوة؛ لأنه أخو أبيك، أو ابن جدتك من قبل أبيك فهو من قبل الأبوة، والخال من قبل الأمومة؛ لأن الصلة بينك وبينه من قبل الأم، الإخوة من الأم أبناؤهم من جهة الأمومة، والمذهب خلاف هذا، فالمذهب أن أبناء الإخوة من الأم من جهة الأبوة،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies