Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

The evidence that a full sister receives one-half when she is alone, and that two or more full sisters receive two-thirds, is the saying of Allah, Exalted is He:

“They ask you for a ruling. Say, ‘Allah gives you a ruling concerning one who leaves neither ascendants nor descendants: if a man dies leaving no child but has a sister, she shall have one-half of what he leaves.’”

That is, there is no inheriting descendant; nor is there an inheriting male ascendant.

“But if there are two sisters, they shall have two-thirds of what he leaves.” [al-Nisa: 176]

The evidence that a son’s daughter, alongside a daughter, receives one-sixth is the saying of Allah, Exalted is He:

“Allah instructs you concerning your children: the share of the male is equal to that of two females. But if there are only daughters, two or more, they shall have two-thirds of what he leaves.” [al-Nisa: 11]

Thus, when the daughter takes one-half, one-sixth remains to complete the two-thirds. Allah has not prescribed more than two-thirds for female descendants. Therefore, when dividing the estate, we must say: the daughter receives one-half, and the son’s daughter receives one-sixth, completing the two-thirds. Likewise, with full sisters and paternal half-sisters, the full sister receives one-half and the paternal half-sister receives one-sixth. The evidence is the saying of Allah, Exalted is He:

“But if there are two sisters, they shall have two-thirds of what he leaves.” [al-Nisa: 176]

He mentioned no share beyond this. This, praise be to Allah, is clear evidence.

A case arose during the time of Abdullah ibn Masud, may Allah be pleased with him: a daughter, a son’s daughter, and a full sister. They came to seek a legal ruling from Abu Musa al-Ashari, Abdullah ibn Qays, may Allah be pleased with him, and said: “A man has died leaving a daughter, a son’s daughter, and a full sister.” He replied: “The daughter receives one-half, and the full sister receives the remainder, because full sisters become residuary heirs alongside daughters.” He then said to the questioner: “Go to Ibn Masud; he will agree with me on this,” in order to verify the matter.

والدليل على أن الأخوات الشقيقات للواحدة النصف وللثنتين فأكثر الثلثان، قوله تعالى: ﴿يَسْتَفْتُونَكَ قُلِ اللَّهُ يُفْتِيكُمْ فِي الْكَلَالَةِ إِنِ امْرُؤٌ هَلَكَ لَيْسَ لَهُ وَلَدٌ﴾، يعني لا يوجد فرع وارث، ﴿وَلَهُ أُخْتٌ فَلَهَا نِصْفُ مَا تَرَكَ﴾، وأيضاً لا يوجد أصل من الذكور وارث، ﴿فَإِنْ كَانَتَا اثْنَتَيْنِ فَلَهُمَا الثُّلُثَانِ مِمَّا تَرَكَ﴾ [النساء: ١٧٦]. والدليل على أن بنت الابن مع البنت لها السدس، قوله تعالى: ﴿يُوصِيكُمُ اللَّهُ فِي أَوْلَادِكُمْ لِلذَّكَرِ مِثْلُ حَظِّ الأُنْثَيَيْنِ فَإِنْ كُنَّ نِسَاءً فَوْقَ اثْنَتَيْنِ فَلَهُنَّ ثُلُثَا مَا تَرَكَ﴾ [النساء: ١١]، فإذا أخذت البنت النصف يبقى على الثلثين السدسُ، والله ﷿ لم يفرض لإناث الفروع أكثر من الثلثين، ولهذا يجب عند القسم أن نقول: للبنت النصف ولبنت الابن السدس تكملة الثلثين، والأخوات الشقيقات مع الأخوات لأب، للشقيقة النصف وللأخت لأب السدس، والدليل قوله تعالى: ﴿فَإِنْ كَانَتَا اثْنَتَيْنِ فَلَهُمَا الثُّلُثَانِ مِمَّا تَرَكَ﴾ [النساء: ١٧٦]، ولم يذكر زيادة على ذلك، وهذا ـ والحمد لله ـ دليل واضح. وقعت مسألة وهي: بنت وبنت ابن وأخت شقيقة في عهد عبد الله بن مسعود ﵁ فجاؤوا يستفتون أبا موسى الأشعري عبد الله بن قيس ﵁ وقالوا: هلك هالك عن بنت وبنت ابن وأخت شقيقة، فقال: للبنت النصف وللأخت الشقيقة الباقي؛ لأن الأخوات الشقيقات مع البنات عصبات، ثم قال للسائل: ائتِ ابن مسعود فسيوافقني على ذلك، للتثبت،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies