Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

one-third.” Had we taken the better course into account, we would have said, “So-and-so has no more than one-fifth.” Would that the author—may Allah have mercy on him—had said, “and distributing his fifth,” or at least, “and distributing whatever he has bequeathed.” For if he says, “one-third,” people will become accustomed to one-third.

His statement, “and looking after his minor children”: looking after minor children is likewise a known disposition. Thus, he may say, “So-and-so is the executor over my minor sons and daughters.” This is permissible, and this executor becomes responsible for the children, attending to their interests: their maintenance, clothing, upbringing, and housing.

Does he have the authority to appoint someone by will to marry off his daughters?

The authoritative position of the school is that he does. Thus, he may say, “So-and-so is the executor for the marriage of my daughters.” Even if they have full brothers, the brothers may not marry them off, because guardianship in marriage is acquired through appointment by will. However, this view is very weak, because guardianship in marriage is an independent form of guardianship. It belongs to a person during his lifetime, and when he dies, it passes to the one who is legally most entitled to it. Therefore, according to the stronger view, guardianship in marriage is not acquired through appointment by will.

Our statement that it is not acquired through appointment by will implies that it is acquired through kinship. Thus, if he appoints his daughters’ eldest full brother by will to marry them off, this is valid, because after him, he is their guardian—except for a daughter who has married and borne children, for her sons are her guardians.

Thus, the stronger view regarding marriage is that the appointed executor does not have the authority, by virtue of this appointment, to marry them off. But if we wish to act in accordance with both the stronger view and the authoritative position of the school, what should we do? For we face a difficulty: if the executor—who is unrelated to them—marries them off, then according to the school

ثلث، ولو راعينا الأفضل لقلنا: ما له خمس، فليت المؤلف ﵀ قال: وتفرقة خمسه، أو على الأقل قال: وتفرقة ما أوصى به؛ لأنه لو قال: الثلث، اعتاد الناس على الثلث. قوله: «والنظر لصغاره» النظر للصغار ـ أيضاً ـ من التصرف المعلوم، يقول: الوصي على أولادي الصغار من بنين وبنات فلان، فإنه يجوز ويكون هذا الوصي هو الناظر على الأولاد، يقوم بمصالحهم من نفقة وكسوة وتربية وسكن. وهل يملك أن يوصي بتزويج بناته؟ المذهب: يملك، فيقول: الوصي في تزويج بناتي فلان، حتى وإن كان لهن إخوة أشقاء فإنهم لا يزوجونهن؛ لأن ولاية النكاح تستفاد بالوصية، لكن هذا القول ضعيف جداً؛ لأن ولاية النكاح ولاية مستقلة، هي للإنسان ما دام حياً، فإذا مات انتقلت إلى من هو أولى شرعاً، فلا تستفاد ولاية النكاح ـ على القول الراجح ـ بالوصية. وقولنا: لا تستفاد بالوصية، يفهم منه أنها تستفاد بالقرابة، فلو أوصى أن يزوج بناته أخوهن الأكبر الشقيق، فإنه يصح؛ لأنه هو وليهن بعده، إلا من تزوجت وأتت بأبناء فأبناؤها أولياؤها. إذاً القول الراجح في مسألة التزويج أنه لا يملك الموصى إليه ـ وهو الوصي ـ أن يزوج بهذه الوصية، لكن إذا أردنا أن نعمل بالقول الراجح وبالمذهب فكيف نصنع؟ لأننا نقع في مشكلة، فإذا زوج الوصي ـ وهو بعيد منهن ـ فعلى المذهب

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies