Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

with the intention of acquiring ownership; in that case, he may dispose of it, because once he takes possession of it with the intention of acquiring ownership, it becomes his property.

His statement, “and valid possession,” means that it must be taken with the son’s permission and in the manner previously described in the Book of Sales: that which is movable is taken into possession by being moved; that which is weighed, by being weighed; that which is measured by volume, by being measured; that which is measured by length, by being measured; that which is counted, by being counted; and whatever cannot be dealt with in these ways is taken into possession by relinquishment, such as land. Land, for example, cannot be taken into possession in any of the aforementioned ways; rather, this is done by relinquishment, meaning that he withdraws his control over it.

His statement, “rather, after it”: that is, his disposal by sale, manumission, or release from a debt is valid after revoking the gift, or after acquiring ownership in cases other than gifts.

“The son may not demand from his father a debt or the like, except for the maintenance that the father is obliged to provide him; for he may demand it from him and have him detained for it.”

His statement, “The son may not demand from his father a debt or the like,” means that the son has no right to demand from his father a debt or the like, due to the Prophet’s statement, peace and blessings be upon him: “Indeed, the best of what you consume is from your earnings, and your children are among your earnings” (1). Moreover, if the father is permitted to acquire ownership from his son’s wealth, then the son is not permitted to demand his debt from him.

For example, if a father borrows ten thousand riyals from his son, the son may not say, “My father, give me the debt,” nor may he demand it from him. He may, however, speak indirectly and say, “My father, I am in need, and Allah has made you prosperous.”

(1) Narrated by Imam Ahmad, 6:41; al-Tirmidhi, al-Ahkam, chapter: “What Has Been Reported Regarding a Father Taking from His Son’s Property,” no. 1358; al-Nasa'i, al-Buyu', chapter: “Encouragement to Earn,” 7:240; and Ibn Majah, al-Tijarat, chapter: “What a Man May Take from His Son’s Property,” no. 2290, on the authority of A'ishah. Al-Tirmidhi said: “Hasan sahih” (sound and authentic), and Ibn Hibban graded it sahih (authentic), no. 4261. See also: al-Talkhis, no. 1665; and al-Irwa', no. 1626.
من ابنه بنية التملك، فله حينئذٍ أن يتصرف فيه؛ لأنه لما قبضه بنية التملك صار ملكاً له. وقوله: «وقبض معتبر» بأن يكون بإذن الابن، وعلى الوصف السابق في كتاب البيع، فما ينقل يكون بنقله، وما يوزن بوزنه، وما يكال بكيله، وما يذرع بذرعه، وما يُعَدُّ بِعَدِّهِ، وما لا يتصور فيه ذلك يكون بتخليته، كالأراضي مثلاً، فالأراضي لا يمكن أن تقبض بما ذكر، فيكون بالتخلية بمعنى أن يرفع يده عنها. قوله: «بل بعده»، أي: بل يصح تصرفه بالبيع أو العتق أو الإبراء بعد الرجوع في الهبة، أو بعد التملك في غير الهبة. وَلَيْسَ لِلْوَلَدِ مُطَالَبَةُ أَبِيهِ بِدَيْنٍ وَنَحْوِهِ إِلاَّ بِنَفَقَتِهِ الوَاجِبَةِ عَلَيْهِ، فَإِنَّ لَهُ مُطَالبَتَهُ بِهَا وَحَبْسَهُ عَلَيْهَا. قوله: «وليس للولد مطالبة أبيه بدين ونحوه»، يعني لا يملك الولد أن يطالب والده بدين ونحوه؛ لقول النبي ﷺ: «إن أطيب ما أكلتم من كسبكم وإن أولادكم من كسبكم» (١)، ولأنه إذا جاز أن يتملك من ماله فإنه لا يجوز للولد أن يطالبه بدَينه. مثال ذلك: استقرض الأب من ابنه عشرة آلاف ريال، فليس للولد أن يقول: يا أبتِ أعطني الدَّين، وليس له أن يطالبه، ولكن له أن يُعَرِّض ويقول: يا أبت أنا محتاج، وأنت قد أغناك الله
(١) أخرجه الإمام أحمد (٦/ ٤١)؛ والترمذي في الأحكام/ باب ما جاء أن الوالد يأخذ من مال ولده (١٣٥٨)؛ والنسائي في البيوع/ باب الحث على الكسب (٧/ ٢٤٠) وابن ماجه في التجارات/ باب ما للرجل من مال ولده (٢٢٩٠)؛ عن عائشة ﵂، وقال الترمذي: حسن صحيح، وصححه ابن حبان (٤٢٦١). وانظر: التلخيص (١٦٦٥)؛ والإرواء (١٦٢٦).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies