the recipient does not own its usufruct until the lease term has ended. Thus, if he leases out his house for one year, then gives it as a gift to another person after six months have passed, the gift is valid; however, the recipient does not own its usufruct until the term has ended. That is, the tenant’s right remains as it was. As for the rent that becomes due, it belongs proportionately to the recipient from the time the gift was made to him.
His words, “and a dog that may be kept,” mean that it is valid to give as a gift a dog which may lawfully be kept. Although a dog may not validly be sold, this is because what is prohibited is taking payment for it. If one gives it without compensation, there is no harm in doing so. Moreover, giving it is not a true gift in the strict sense; rather, it amounts to relinquishing one’s exclusive right to that dog. Otherwise, a dog cannot validly be sold, and whatever cannot validly be sold cannot validly be given as a gift.
His words, “and a dog that may be kept,” teach us—may Allah grant us and him success—that a dog which may not be kept cannot validly be given as a gift, because in this case the giver has no right to it which he could relinquish by giving it away.
A dog may be kept for one of three purposes: farming, livestock, or hunting (1). These are the three purposes for which it is permissible to keep a dog, provided that it is not black. If it is black, it may not be kept, because its game is not lawful to eat, and because it is a devil (2); therefore, it may not be kept. But the dog