Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Chapter: The Foundling

A foundling is a child whose lineage and status of freedom or slavery are unknown, who has been abandoned or has gone astray. ………………

His statement, “The foundling”: He follows the chapter on lost property with the chapter on the foundling, and the connection is evident: lost property concerns things that have gone missing, whereas this concerns human beings who have gone missing. It is therefore fitting that they place the chapter on the foundling after the chapter on lost property. There are, moreover, other connections, such as with the chapter on what lineage is established and what is not established, and likewise with inheritance. Yet it most closely resembles lost property, which is why they made it follow that chapter.

In Arabic, laqīṭ (foundling) is an adjective in the pattern faʿīl with the meaning of a passive participle, because this pattern frequently carries the passive sense in Arabic. Thus, qatīl means “slain,” and jarīḥ means “wounded.” Although the basic meaning of this pattern is that of an active participle, it may carry a passive sense according to the context and indications. Thus, laqīṭ means malqūṭ: one who has been picked up.

As for its technical definition, the author says: “It is a child whose lineage and status of freedom or slavery are unknown, who has been abandoned or has gone astray.”

His statement, “a child”: a child is one who has not yet reached the age of discernment.

His statement, “whose lineage is unknown”: that is, it is not known to whom he belongs. If his lineage is known, then he is not a foundling.

His statement, “and whose status of freedom or slavery”: it is not known whether he is free, traced to so-and-so, son of so-and-so, or a slave owned by so-and-so or so-and-so.

His statement, “who has been abandoned”: that is, he is found abandoned, and we know that he has been abandoned from the contextual indications,

بَابُ اللَّقِيطِ وَهُوَ طِفْلٌ لَا يُعْرَفُ نَسَبُهُ، وَلَا رِقُّهُ، نُبِذَ أَوْ ضَلَّ ...................... قوله: «اللقيط» أعقبه لباب «اللقطة» والمناسبة ظاهرة؛ لأن اللقطة ضياع الأموال، وهذا ضياع الآدميين، فلذلك ناسب أن يجعلوا باب اللقيط بعد باب اللقطة، وإلا فله مناسبات أخرى، كمناسبة باب ما يلحق من النسب وما لا يلحق، وكذلك في الميراث، لكنه أشبه ما يكون باللقطة فلذلك جعلوه تابعاً لها. واللقيط في اللغة العربية فعيل بمعنى مفعول؛ لأن فعيلاً في اللغة العربية تأتي بمعنى مفعول في مواطن كثيرة، يقال: قتيل بمعنى مقتول، وجريح بمعنى مجروح، وإلا فالأصل أن فعيلاً بمعنى فاعل، لكنها قد تأتي بمعنى مفعول حسب السياق والقرائن، فلقيط بمعنى ملقوط أي: مأخوذ. أما في الاصطلاح فقال المؤلف: «وهو طفل لا يعرف نسبه ولا رقه نبذ أو ضل». فقوله: «وهو طفل» الطفل من دون التمييز. وقوله: «لا يُعْرَفُ نسبه» أي: لا يدرى لمن هو، فإذا عرف نسبه فليس بلقيط. وقوله: «ولا رِقُّه» فلا يدرى أهو حر ينتسب إلى فلان بن فلان، أو رقيق يملكه فلان أو فلان؟ وقوله: «نُبِذَ» أي: وجد منبوذاً، ونعرف أنه منبوذ بالقرائن،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies