Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

and whoever gets there first has the greater right to it? Or do we say: Whoever was in a place yesterday has the greater right to it?

The answer is the former. So long as the regulations stipulate that occupancy is determined day by day, then once the first day has ended and the second begins, whoever gets there first has the greater right to it.

If two people arrive first at the same time, they should draw lots. The one upstream with respect to unowned water has the right to water and to hold back the water until it reaches his ankles, then release it to the one next to him. The imam alone, to the exclusion of others, may designate a protected pasture for the riding animals of the Muslims, so long as this does not harm them.

His statement, “If two people arrive first at the same time, they should draw lots,” means that they arrive at a place to sell there, each reaching the place at precisely the same time. We then consider: if the land can be divided between them and each can benefit from the portion he takes, we divide it between them. But if this is not possible, such that there is room for only one shop, do we say that priority should be given to the older one, or to the poorer one because he is more deserving of consideration, or to the wealthier one because he will bring to this place goods that the poor person cannot bring? We say: all of these are subjective considerations, so the matter returns to the basic principle: they arrived there equally, and there is no means of distinguishing between them except by drawing lots.

But how should lots be drawn?

We say: drawing lots is whatever achieves a distinction; it is not restricted to any particular form. Whatever achieves that distinction constitutes drawing lots, and its forms vary. People differ in how they draw lots; the aim is simply to distinguish between the parties.

His statement, “The one upstream with respect to unowned water has the right to water and to hold back the water until it reaches his ankles,” means that “has the right to water” is a fronted predicate, while “the one upstream” is the delayed subject. “Unowned water” means water that is not privately owned, for water is of two types: privately owned water and unowned water.

ومن سبق فهو أحق؟ أو نقول: من كان في مكان بالأمس فهو أحق به؟ الجواب: الأول، فما دام النظام يقول: الجلوس كل يوم بيومه، فإذا انتهى اليوم الأول وجاء الثاني فإن من سبق فهو أحق. وَإِنْ سَبَقَ اثْنَانِ اقْتَرَعَا، وَلِمَنْ فِي أَعْلَى المَاءِ المُبَاحِ السَّقْيُ وَحَبْسُ المَاءِ إِلَى أَنْ يَصِلَ إِلَى كَعْبِهِ ثُمَّ يُرْسِلُهُ إِلَى مَنْ يَلِيهِ. وَلِلإمَامِ دُونَ غَيْرِهِ حِمَى مَرْعىً لِدَوَابِّ المُسْلِمينَ مَا لَمْ يَضُرَّهُمْ. قوله: «وإن سبق اثنان اقترعا» يعني سبقا إلى مكان ليبيعا فيه، بأن يكون كل واحد وصل إلى المكان في نفس الوقت، فإننا ننظر إن أمكن توزيع الأرض بينهما وانتفاع كل منهما بما أخذ فإننا نقسمها بينهما، وإن لم يمكن بحيث لا تتسع إلا لمتجر واحد، فهل نقول: ينظر إلى الأكبر سناً، أو إلى الأفقر؛ لأنه أحق بالمراعاة، أو إلى الأغنى، لأنه سوف يجلب إلى هذا المكان ما لا يستطيع الفقير أن يجلبه؟ نقول: كل هذه مسائل اعتبارية فيرجع إلى الأصل، وهو أنهما تساويا في الوصول إليه، ولا طريق إلى التمييز إلا بالقرعة. ولكن كيف نقرع؟ نقول: القرعة هي ما يحصل بها التمييز، ولا تتعين بشكل معين، فكل ما يحصل به التمييز فهو قرعة وهو يختلف، والناس يختلفون في كيفية الإقراع، والمقصود هو التمييز. قوله: «ولمن في أعلى الماء المباح السقي وحبس الماء إلى أن يصل إلى كعبه» «لمن» خبر مقدم، و «السقي» مبتدأ مؤخر، و «الماء المباح» يراد به ما ليس بمملوك؛ لأن الماء نوعان: نوع مملوك، ونوع مباح.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies