Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Section

If it is mixed with something indistinguishable from it, such as oil with oil or wheat with wheat; or if he dyes a garment; or mixes sawīq (parched grain flour) with oil, or vice versa; and its value neither decreases nor increases, then they are partners in it in proportion to their respective property. But if its value decreases, he is liable for that decrease ………

His statement, “If it is mixed with something indistinguishable from it”: the pronoun in “if it is mixed” refers to the usurped property. When the usurped property is mixed, it is either mixed with something distinguishable from it or with something indistinguishable from it. Thus, there are two categories:

The first is when it is mixed with something indistinguishable from it, “such as oil with oil or wheat with wheat.” The like of oil is oil, and the like of wheat is wheat. For example, if someone usurps a vessel of oil and mixes it with a vessel of oil that he owns, it is then impossible to distinguish the usurped oil from the other, because they have become mixed. Likewise, if he mixes wheat with wheat, it cannot be distinguished because it has become mixed; it is impossible to distinguish the grain belonging to the usurper from that belonging to the owner of the usurped property. What, then, is the ruling?

The author, may Allah have mercy on him, said: “If its value neither decreases nor increases, then they are partners in it in proportion to their respective property. But if its value decreases, he is liable for that decrease.” An example is where he usurps one ṣāʿ of wheat and mixes it with one ṣāʿ of wheat of the same kind. In that case, they are partners, provided that the value neither decreases nor increases. If the value decreases as a result of the mixing—for instance, people prefer to buy a small quantity of wheat, while he has mixed one hundred ṣāʿs with one hundred ṣāʿs, causing the value to fall—then the usurper is liable for the decrease. But if its value neither decreases nor increases, then they are partners in proportion to their respective property. Thus, if the usurper owns two ṣāʿs

فَصْلٌ وَإِنْ خُلِطَ بِمَا لَا يَتَمَيَّزُ كَزَيْتٍ، أَوْ حِنْطَةٍ بِمِثْلِهِمَا، أَوْ صَبَغَ الثَّوْبَ، أَوْ لَتَّ سَوِيقاً بِدُهْنٍ، أَوْ عَكْسُهُ وَلَمْ تَنْقُصِ القِيمَةُ وَلَمْ تَزِدْ، فَهُمَا شَرِيكَانِ بِقَدْرِ مَالَيْهِمَا فِيهِ، وَإِنْ نَقَصَتْ القِيمَةُ ضَمِنَهَا ........ قوله: «وإن خُلِط بما لا يتميز» الضمير في قوله: «إن خلط» يعود على المغصوب، فإذا خلط المغصوب، فإما أن يخلط بما يتميز، وإما أن يخلط بما لا يتميز، فهنا قسمان: الأول: إذا خلط بما لا يتميز «كزيت أو حنطة بمثلهما» مِثْلُ الزيت زيت، ومثلُ الحنطة حنطة، فمثلاً لو غصب إناء من الزيت وخلطه بإناء عنده من الزيت، فهنا لا يمكن تمييز المغصوب من غيره؛ لأنه اختلط، وكذلك لو خلط حنطة بحنطة فلا يمكن تمييزه؛ لأنه اختلط، فلا يمكن تمييز الحبة التي للغاصب من الحبة التي للمغصوب منه، فماذا يكون الحكم؟ قال المؤلف ﵀: «ولم تنقص القيمة ولم تزد فهما شريكان بقدر ماليهما فيه، وإن نقصت القيمة ضمنها» مثال ذلك: لو غصب صاعاً من البر وخلطه بصاع من البر من جنسه، فهنا يكونان شريكين بشرط أن لا تنقص القيمة ولا تزد، فإن نقصت القيمة بالخلط بأن كان الناس يختارون أن يشتروا شيئاً قليلاً من البر، وهو قد خلط مائة صاع بمائة صاع فتنقص القيمة، فإذا نقصت فعلى الغاصب ضمان النقص، وأما إذا لم تنقص ولم تزد فهما شريكان بقدر ماليهما، فإذا كان للغاصب صاعان

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies