Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Chapter on Usurpation

Usurpation is the forcible seizure, without right, of another person’s property rights, whether immovable or movable …

His statement, “Usurpation,” is a verbal noun derived from ghaṣaba, meaning to seize by force. In legal terminology, the author defines it as: “the forcible seizure, without right, of another person’s property rights.”

The phrase, “another person’s property rights,” includes both ownership and an exclusive right of use. Ownership includes such things as money, cars, and the like. An exclusive right of use applies to something that cannot itself be owned, yet whose possessor has a greater claim to it than others. An example is a hunting dog: it cannot be owned and therefore cannot be bought or sold. Another example is impure manure, such as donkey droppings: its possessor has a greater claim to it, but it is not legally considered property. Another example is the wine of a dhimmī (a non-Muslim under Muslim protection): he has a greater claim to it. It is not legally considered property in relation to Muslims, but it is considered property in relation to dhimmīs.

The phrase, “forcibly,” excludes theft, stealthy misappropriation, snatching, and the like, because theft, stealthy misappropriation, and snatching are not carried out by force.

It also excludes the case in which a person takes possession of someone else’s property with that person’s consent. However, if the other person’s apparent consent was obtained through coercion—for example, if he appoints him over his property under duress—this is not considered permission.

The phrase, “without right,” excludes seizure made lawfully. If one takes possession of it lawfully, he is not a usurper. An example is a guardian’s taking

بَابُ الغَصْبِ وَهُوَ الاسْتِيلَاءُ عَلَى حَقِّ غَيْرِهِ قَهْراً بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ مِنْ عَقَارٍ وَمَنْقُولٍ .......... قوله: «الغصب» مصدر غَصَب يغصِب غصباً بمعنى قهر، وفي الاصطلاح عرَّفه المؤلف بقوله: «وهو الاستيلاء على حق غيره قهراً بغير حق». فقوله: «حق غيره» سواء كان مِلكاً أو اختصاصاً، فالملك كالدراهم والسيارات وغيرها، والاختصاص كالشيء الذي لا يُملك ولكن صاحبه أخص به، مثل كلب الصيد فإن كلب الصيد لا يملك ولذلك لا يباع ولا يشترى، ومثل السرجين النجس كرَوث الحمير مثلاً، فإن صاحبه أخص به وليس بمال؛ ومثل خمر الذمي، فإنه أخص بها وهي بالنسبة للمسلمين ليست بمال وبالنسبة للذميين مال. وقوله: «قهراً» خرج به السرقة، والاختلاس، والانتهاب، وما أشبه ذلك؛ لأن السرقة، والاختلاس، والانتهاب ليست قهراً. وخرج به ـ أيضاً ـ ما لو استولى على مال الغير باختيار الغير، ولكن إن كان الغير مختاراً على سبيل الإكراه كأن يوليه على ملكه على سبيل الإكراه، فإن هذا لا يُعد إذناً. وقوله: «بغير حق» خرج به ما إذا استولى عليه بحق، فإذا استولى عليه بحق فإنه ليس بغاصب، مثال ذلك: أَخْذُ الولي

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies