Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

interlacing. As for soil, it does not flow, so the fingers need to be interlaced. (1)

We say: there is room for consideration as to whether interlacing the fingers should be prescribed at all, even as a sunnah, because the Messenger ﷺ did not interlace his fingers in the hadith of Ammar.

If it is said: Does this not fall under the general purport of the hadith of Laqit ibn Sabirah, may Allah be pleased with him:

“Perform ablution thoroughly, interlace the fingers, and draw water deeply into the nose,” (2)

we reply: No, because the hadith of Laqit ibn Sabirah concerns purification with water.

For this reason, there remains some reservation concerning the recommendation of interlacing the fingers in dry ablution, for two reasons:

First, it has not been narrated from the Prophet ﷺ.

Second, dry ablution is founded upon facilitation and ease, unlike purification with water. In purification from major ritual impurity with water, the entire body must be covered; whereas in dry ablution, only two limbs are involved. Moreover, according to the stronger view, it is not obligatory in dry ablution to cover the entire face and hands. Rather, concession is made for whatever cannot be reached by wiping except with difficulty, such as the inner parts of the hair. Thus, it is not obligatory for the soil to reach them, even if the hair is thin; only the outer surface is wiped. In ablution with water, however, it is obligatory to ensure that it reaches

(1) Ibn Rajab said: “What they have stated concerning the manner of performing tayammum (dry ablution) has not been transmitted from Imam Ahmad, nor was it held by any of his early followers, such as al-Khiraqi, Abu Bakr, and others.” See Ibn Rajab, Fath al-Bari, 2:94. (2) Its source reference was given previously on p. 149.
تخليل، وأما التُّراب فلا يجري فيحتاج إِلى تخليل (١). ونحن نقول: إِثبات التَّخليل ـ ولو سُنَّة ـ فيه نَظَر؛ لأن الرَّسول ﷺ في حديث عمَّار لم يخلِّل أصابعَه. فإِن قيل: ألَا يدخل في عُموم حديث لَقيط بن صَبِرة ﵁: «أَسبغ الوُضُوء، وخلِّلْ بين الأصابِع، وبالِغْ في الاسْتِنْشاق» (٢). أجيب: بالمنْع؛ لأنَّ حديث لَقيط بن صَبِرَة في طَهارة الماء. ولهذا ففي النَّفس شيء من استحباب التخليل في التَّيمُّم لأمرين: أولاً: أنه لم يَرِدْ عن النَّبيِّ ﷺ. وثانياً: أنَّ طهارة التَّيمُّم مبنيَّة على التَّيسير والسُّهولة، بخلاف الماء؛ ففي طهارة الماء في الجنابة يجب استيعاب كل البَدَنِ؛ وفي التَّيمُّم عُضوان فقط، وفي التَّيمُّم لا يجب استيعاب الوَجْه والكفَّين على الرَّاجِح، بل يُتَسامَح عن الشَّيء الذي لا يَصِل إِليه المسْح إِلا بمشقَّة كباطن الشَّعْر، فلا يجب إِيصال التُّراب إِليه ولو كان خفيفاً، فيُمْسَح الظَّاهرُ فقط، وفي الوُضُوء يجب إِيصال
(١) قال ابنُ رجب: «وهذا الذي قالوه في صفة التَّيمم؛ لم يُنقل عن الإِمام أحمد، ولا قاله أحدٌ من متقدِّمي أصحابه؛ كالخرقي وأبي بكرٍ وغيرِهما». انظر: «فتح الباري» لابن رجب (٢/ ٩٤) ..... (٢) تقدم تخريجه ص (١٤٩).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies