Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

holds that this is not permissible, because the worker has gained nothing. However, if it were held to be permissible, there would be grounds for that view, since the worker has volunteered his own labour to work in this orchard. Yet it may be said: if we deem it permissible here, then the cost of the necessary supplies must be borne by the owner, lest the worker be burdened with both financial and physical loss. Moreover, this is unknown, since it is not known what supplies the palm trees will require.

His statement, “It is stipulated that the share be known and undivided”: this has already preceded in the discussion of partnerships. The share must therefore be a known, undivided portion, such as a quarter, a half, a third, an eighth, or a tenth, according to whatever the two agree upon.

If it is unknown—for example, if he says, “I enter into a sharecropping contract with you concerning these trees in return for some of their fruit”—then this is not permissible, because it is unknown.

If he says, “I enter into a sharecropping contract with you concerning these trees in return for one hundred kilograms of their fruit,” this is not valid, because it is not an undivided share.

If he says, “I enter into a sharecropping contract with you concerning these trees: you will have two rows of palm trees, and I will have two rows,” the rows being lines of palm trees, this is not permissible, because it is not an undivided share.

If he says, “I enter into a sharecropping contract with you concerning these palm trees on the condition that the fruit of the first year is yours and that of the second year is mine,” this is not permissible, because it involves uncertainty and ignorance, leads to dispute, and may result in one of them alone bearing the loss or receiving the gain. The basic principle in a partnership is that the two partners share both gain and loss.

Rāfiʿ ibn Khadīj, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “In the time of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, people would lease out irrigation channels, the banks alongside watercourses, and certain crops

لا يجوز؛ لأن العامل ما ربح شيئاً، لكن لو قيل بالجواز لكان له وجه؛ لأن العامل تبرع بنفسه أن يعمل في هذا البستان، لكن قد يقال: إذا قلنا بالجواز هنا، فيجب أن تكون مؤنة المواد على المالك لئلاً نجمع على العامل بين الخسارة المالية والبدنية، ولأن هذا مجهول إذ لا يدرى ما يستحقه النخل من المواد؟ قوله: «ويشترط أن يكون الجزء معلوماً مشاعاً» وهذه سبقت في الشركة، فلا بد أن يكون جزءاً مشاعاً معلوماً مثل: ربع، ونصف، وثلث، وثمن، وعشر، حسب ما يتفقان عليه. فإن كان غير معلوم، بأن قال: ساقيتك على هذا الشجر ببعض ثمره، فهذا لا يجوز؛ لأنه مجهول. ولو قال: ساقيتك على هذا الشجر بمائة كيلو منه، فهذا لا يصح؛ لأنه غير مشاع. ولو قال: ساقيتك على هذا الشجر، ولك مقطران، ولي مقطران، والمقاطر هي صفوف النخل، فلا يجوز؛ لأنه ليس مشاعاً. لو قال: ساقيتك على هذا النخل على أنَّ ثمرة العام لك، وثمرة الثاني لي، فهذا لا يجوز؛ لأنه غرر وجهالة ويؤدي إلى النزاع، ويؤدي إلى المغرم أو المغنم لأحدهما دون الآخر، والأصل في الشركة اشتراك الشريكين في المغنم والمغرم. يقول رافع بن خديج ﵁: «كان الناس يؤاجرون على عهد النبي ﷺ الماذيانات وأقبال الجداول وأشياء

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies