Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

or delayed after it, so long as both remain in the same session. If they occupy themselves with something that breaks the session, it is invalidated. This is the verbal form; it may also be concluded by mutual exchange, which is the action-based form.

His statement, “or delayed after it, so long as both remain in the same session. If they occupy themselves with something that breaks the session, it is invalidated”: “delayed” is a circumstantial qualifier of acceptance. That is, acceptance may immediately follow the offer, or it may be delayed.

That it may immediately follow the offer is clear. For example, one may say, “I have sold you this for ten,” and the buyer says, “I accept.” Here, the acceptance immediately follows the offer, and there is no problem with this.

It is also permissible for acceptance to be delayed after the offer. Thus, one may say, “I have sold you this for ten,” and the buyer then remains silent while considering the matter. Before purchasing something, a person may feel a desire for it; but when the seller says, “I have sold it,” he may perhaps hesitate, and that desire may fade. The dearest thing to a person is what is withheld from him. Thus, you find that bird hunters desire a bird before shooting it; but once they have shot it and it falls to the ground, it becomes worth nothing to them. Likewise, when goods are in the seller’s possession and someone says, “Will you sell me this item for ten?” and he replies, “Yes, I will sell it for ten,” then there is no problem if acceptance is delayed. However, we say that if it is delayed, certain conditions must be met:

First: it must take place in the same session.

Second: neither party must occupy himself with something that breaks the session.

Third: the acceptance must correspond to the offer.

As for remaining in the same session, this excludes the case in which it takes place in a different session. For example, if he says, “I have sold you this commodity for ten,” then they part ways, and later he returns and says, “I accept,” this acceptance is not valid, because the session has changed.

Likewise, if they occupy themselves with something that breaks the session—for example, if he says, “I have sold you this car for thirty thousand,” and the other says, “Today I passed by the college and found so-and-so successful,”

مُتَراخِياً عَنْهُ فِي مَجْلِسِهِ، فَإِن اشتَغَلَا بِمَا يَقْطَعُهُ بَطَلَ وَهِي الصِّيغَةُ القَوْلِيَّة وَبِمُعَاطَاةٍ وَهِيَ الفِعْلِيَّةُ .. قوله: «متراخياً عنه في مجلسه، فإن اشتغلا بما يقطعه بطل» متراخياً: هذا حال من القبول، يعني أن القبول يجوز أن يكون عقيب الإيجاب، ويجوز أن يكون متراخياً عنه، أما كونه جائزاً عقيب الإيجاب فالأمر واضح، كأن يقول: بعتك هذا بعشرة، ويقول المشتري: قبلت، فالقبول هنا أعقب الإيجاب وهذا لا إشكال فيه، ويجوز أن يتراخى عن الإيجاب، فيقول: بعتك هذا بعشرة، ثم يسكت المشتري يفكر؛ لأن الإنسان قبل أن يبتاع الشيء يجد في نفسه رغبة فيه، فإذا قال: بعتك، ربما يتريث وتزول هذه الرغبة، وأحب شيء إلى الإنسان ما مُنِعَ، ولهذا تجد الصيادين الذين يصيدون الطيور قبل أن يرمي الطير يكون عنده رغبة في هذا الطير، فإذا رماه وسقط على الأرض صار لا يساوي شيئاً عنده، وهذه السلع التي في يد البائع، إذا قال: هل تبيعني هذا الشيء بعشرة؟ قال: نعم أبيعه بعشرة، فهنا لو تأخر القبول فلا بأس، لكن نقول: إذا تراخى عنه فلا بد من شروط: الأول: أن يكون في مجلسه. الثاني: ألا يتشاغلا عنه بما يقطعه. الثالث: أن يطابق القبول الإيجاب. أما كونه في المجلس فهو احتراز مما لو كان في غير المجلس، بأن قال: بعتك هذه السلعة بعشرة ثم تفرقا ثم رجع، وقال: قبلت فلا يصح هذا القبول لتغير المجلس. وكذلك لو تشاغلا بما يقطعه بأن قال: بعتك هذه السيارة بثلاثين ألفاً، فقال: مررت اليوم بالكلية، ووجدت فلاناً ناجحاً،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies