Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

them all according to their ability and capacity. For example, regarding the orphans in a town, we do not say that it suffices to give to three of them—the minimum number denoted by the plural. Rather, we should seek out every orphan in the town and give him a share of this, namely one-fifth of the fifth. As for one entitled to zakah, it has already been mentioned that it is permissible to limit it to a single person.

If someone were to ask: What is the difference? We say: The difference is that the sunnah establishes the permissibility of limiting it to one person, as in the hadith of Mu'adh ibn Jabal: “Inform them that Allah has obligated upon them a charity to be taken from their wealthy and returned to their poor.” (1) He did not mention the remaining categories, even though this was after the revelation of the verse. Here, however, Allah the Exalted says:

“And know that whatever spoils you obtain, one fifth thereof is for Allah, the Messenger, his near relatives, the orphans, the poor, and the stranded traveler.” [al-Anfal 8:41]

Thus, everyone in whom this description is found is entitled to it.

He then divides the remainder of the war booty: the foot soldier receives one share, while the horseman receives three shares—one share for himself and two shares for his horse.

His statement, “He then divides the remainder of the war booty: the foot soldier receives one share, while the horseman receives three shares—one share for himself and two shares for his horse,” means that the remainder is four-fifths. The foot soldier receives one share, and the horseman receives three: one for himself and two for his horse. This is because the Prophet did so at Khaybar: he assigned the foot soldier—one who fights on foot—one share, and the horseman three shares. (2) Why did he distinguish between them?

The answer is that the horseman’s effectiveness and benefit are greater than those of the foot soldier.

(1) Narrated by al-Bukhari in Zakat, Chapter: The Obligation of Zakat, no. 1395; and Muslim in Faith, Chapter: Calling to the Two Testimonies of Faith, no. 19. (2) Narrated by al-Bukhari in Military Expeditions, Chapter: The Expedition of Khaybar, no. 4228; and Muslim in Jihad, Chapter: How the Spoils of War Are Divided Among Those Present, no. 1762, on the authority of Ibn Umar.
بحسب القدرة والطاقة، فمثلاً اليتامى في البلد لا نقول: إنه يجزئ أن نعطي ثلاثة منهم، أي: أقل الجمع، بل نبحث عن كل يتيم في البلد ونعطيه من هذا الذي هو خمس الخمس، أما مستحق الزكاة فقد سبق أنه يجوز الاقتصار على واحد. فإن قال قائل: ما الفرق؟ قلنا: الفرق أنه ثبت في السنّة جواز الاقتصار على واحد كما في حديث معاذ بن جبل ﵁: «أعلمهم أن الله افترض عليهم صدقة تؤخذ من أغنيائهم فترد في فقرائهم» (١)، ولم يذكر بقية الأصناف مع أن هذا بعد نزول الآية، وأما هنا فقال الله تعالى: ﴿فَأَنَّ لِلَّهِ خُمُسَهُ وَلِلرَّسُولِ وَلِذِي الْقُرْبَى وَالْيَتَامَى وَالْمَسَاكِينِ وَابْنِ السَّبِيلِ﴾ [الأنفال: ٤١]، فكل من قام به هذا الوصف استحق. ثُمَّ يَقْسِمُ بَاقِي الغَنِيْمَة لِلرَّاجِلِ سَهْمٌ، وَلِلفَارِسِ ثَلَاثَةُ أسْهُمٍ، سَهْمٌ لَهُ وَسهْمَانِ لِفَرَسِهِ. . قوله: «ثم يقسم باقي الغنيمة للراجل سهم، وللفارس ثلاثة أسهم، سهم له وسهمان لفرسه» الباقي أربعة أخماس، للراجل سهم، وللفارس ثلاثة أسهم، سهم له وسهمان لفرسه؛ لأن النبي ﷺ فعل ذلك في خيبر، جعل للراجل ـ الذي على رِجْله ـ سهماً واحداً، وللفارس ثلاثة أسهم (٢)، لماذا فرَّق بينهما؟. الجواب: لأن غَناء الفارس ونفعه أكثر من غناء الراجل.
(١) أخرجه البخاري في الزكاة/ باب وجوب الزكاة (١٣٩٥) ومسلم في الإيمان/ باب الدعاء إلى الشهادتين (١٩). (٢) أخرجه البخاري في المغازي/ باب غزوة خيبر (٤٢٢٨)؛ ومسلم في الجهاد/ باب كيفية قسمة الغنيمة بين الحاضرين (١٧٦٢)، عن ابن عمر ﵄.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies