Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

The evidence for this is the Prophet’s statement: “When the ten days begin, and one of you intends to offer a sacrifice, let him not take anything from his hair, skin, or nails.” (1) The basic implication of a prohibition is that it is forbidden.

The wisdom behind this is that, out of His mercy, Allah has singled out the pilgrims for the sacrificial offering and has prescribed for the rites of Hajj certain restrictions and prohibitions. When a person refrains from these prohibited matters for Allah’s sake, he is rewarded. As for those who are not in the state of consecration for Hajj or ‘Umrah, He has prescribed the sacrifice for them in place of the sacrificial offering, and has prescribed that they refrain from removing any hair, nails, or skin, because one in the state of consecration does not remove anything from his hair—that is, he does not indulge in personal grooming. Thus, they too are like him in this respect. This is part of Allah’s justice and wisdom. Similarly, the caller to prayer is rewarded for giving the call, while one who is not the caller is rewarded for repeating after him; therefore, he has been prescribed to follow along.

His statement, “It is forbidden,” represents one of the two opinions on the matter.

The second opinion is that it is disliked, but not forbidden.

However, the view that it is forbidden appears closer to what is correct, because that is the basic implication of a prohibition—especially in matters that evidently involve worship—and because the Prophet emphasized the prohibition by saying, “let him not take”; the final nun here is for emphasis.

His statement, “for the one who offers a sacrifice,” indicates that there is no blame upon the one on whose behalf the sacrifice is offered if he removes any of these things. The evidence for this is as follows:

First: this is the apparent meaning of the hadith: namely, that the prohibition is exclusive

(1) Narrated by Muslim in al-Adahi (Sacrificial Animals), chapter: “The prohibition for one upon whom the first ten days of Dhu al-Hijjah begin to take anything from his hair ...” (1977), on the authority of Umm Salamah.
والدليل على ذلك قول النبي ﷺ: «إذا دخل العشر، وأراد أحدكم أن يضحي فلا يأخذن من شعره ولا من بشرته ولا من ظفره شيئاً» (١)، والأصل في النهي التحريم. والحكمة من ذلك أن الله ﷾ برحمته لما خص الحجاج بالهدي، وجعل لنسك الحج محرمات ومحظورات، وهذه المحظورات إذا تركها الإنسان لله أثيب عليها، والذين لم يحرموا بحج ولا عمرة شرع لهم أن يضحوا في مقابل الهدي، وشرع لهم أن يتجنبوا الأخذ من الشعور والأظفار والبشرة لأن المحرم لا يأخذ من شعره شيئاً، يعني لا يترفه، فهؤلاء ـ أيضاً ـ مثله، وهذا من عدل الله ﷿ وحكمته، كما أن المؤذن يثاب على الأذان، وغير المؤذن يثاب على المتابعة، فشرع له أن يتابع. وقوله: «يحرم»، هذا أحد القولين في المسألة. والقول الثاني: أنه يكره وليس بحرام. ولكن الذي يظهر أن التحريم أقرب؛ لأنه الأصل في النهي لا سيما فيما يظهر فيه التعبد، ولأن النبي ﷺ أكد النهي بقوله: «فلا يأخذن»، والنون هذه للتوكيد. وقوله: «على من يضحي» يفهم منه أن من يُضَحَّى عنه لا حرج عليه أن يأخذ من ذلك، والدليل على هذا ما يلي: أولاً: أن هذا هو ظاهر الحديث، وهو أن التحريم خاص
(١) أخرجه مسلم في الأضاحي/ باب نهي من دخل عليه عشر ذي الحجة أن يأخذ من شعره … (١٩٧٧) عن أم سلمة ﵂.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies