Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

beginning of the rite suffices, just as it does in prayer. The evidence is that a person praying is not required to intend the bowing, prostration, standing, or sitting individually. Circumambulation is therefore not an independent act.

It may also be said: if you do not stipulate intention for standing at Arafah—although it is the greatest of the pillars of Hajj, such that the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Hajj is Arafah” (1)—then what is equivalent to it or less than it is even more deserving of this ruling. This is the view preferred by al-Shanqiti in his Qur’anic exegesis, and it is the correct view. It also serves people’s interests, for many people, if asked while circumambulating, “What did you intend by this circumambulation?” would reply, “I intended circumambulation,” without it occurring to them whether it was for Hajj or for Umrah. Yet they are in the state of Hajj. According to the view that stipulates intention, their circumambulation is invalid; according to the second view, it is valid.

Accordingly, we should omit the words, “or its intention,” because there is no pillar for which intention is stipulated. Entering into the state of ihram is the intention for the rite, and it has previously been mentioned that the rite is not established without it. Standing at Arafah does not require an intention.

Accordingly, a specific intention is not stipulated—namely, the intention that it is a circumambulation for Hajj. As for intending circumambulation itself, this is necessary: one must intend to circumambulate, but its being for Hajj is not a condition. Thus, if someone circumambulates without intending it to be for Hajj or Umrah, his circumambulation is valid. However, if he is carried around against his will and made to circumambulate while having no intention, then his circumambulation is invalid, because he did not intend it.

The evidence that the Hajj of one who omits a pillar is invalid is that a pillar is an essential constituent upon which the act of worship is built. It is also established by the Prophet’s statement regarding standing at Arafah: “Whoever arrives on the night of Jamʿ before dawn has caught it” (2). This indicates that if he misses standing at Arafah, he has missed Hajj.

(1) Its source has been cited previously on p. 19. (2) Its source has been cited previously on p. 19.
أولها كالصلاة، بدليل أن المصلي لا يشترط أن ينوي الركوع ولا السجود، ولا القيام ولا القعود، فليس الطواف شيئاً مستقلاً، ويقال: أيضاً إذا كنتم لا تشترطون النية في الوقوف، وهو أعظم أركان الحج حتى قال النبي ﷺ: «الحج عرفة» (١)، فما مثله أو دونه من باب أولى، وهذا القول هو الذي رجحه الشنقيطي في تفسيره، وهو الصواب وفيه مصلحة للناس؛ لأن كثيراً من الناس عند الطواف لو سألته ماذا نويت في الطواف؟ قال: نويت الطواف، وليس على باله أنه للحج أو للعمرة، لكنه متلبس بالحج، وعلى رأي من يشترط النية طوافه غير صحيح، على القول الثاني طوافه صحيح، إذاً نحذف كلمة «أو نيته» لأنه ليس هناك ركن تشترط فيه النية، والإحرام هو نية النسك، وسبق أنه لا ينعقد النسك بفواته، والوقوف لا يشترط له نية. وعليه فلا تشترط نية التعيين أي: أنه طواف للحج، أما نية الطواف فلا بد منها؛ لأنه لا بد أن ينوي الطواف لكن كونه للحج ليس شرطاً، فلو طاف من غير نية أنه للحج أو للعمرة فطوافه صحيح، أما لو أنه حُمِلَ كرهاً وطيف به، وهو لا ينوي فلا يصح طوافه؛ لأنه ما نوى. والدليل على أن تارك الركن لا يصح حجه، أن الركن هو الماهية التي تنبني عليها العبادة، ولقوله ﷺ في الوقوف: «من أتى ليلة جمع قبل الصبح فقد أدرك» (٢)، يدل على أنه إذا فاته الوقوف بعرفة فاته الحج.
(١) سبق تخريجه ص (١٩). (٢) سبق تخريجه ص (١٩).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies