Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

and performed tawaf, or has shaved and performed tawaf, he enters the first stage of release. Although what is reported in the sunnah is that he enters the state of release upon stoning, or upon stoning together with shaving, they said: since Tawaf al-Ifadah (the principal circumambulation) has an effect on the second stage of release, it should likewise have an effect on the first stage of release. This is because, when he has stoned, shaved, and performed tawaf, he enters the second stage of release.

If someone were to say that the release of the one who brings a sacrificial animal with him is also contingent upon slaughtering it, that would have some basis in the Prophet’s saying, peace and blessings be upon him: “I have sacrificial animals with me, so I will not come out of ihram until I slaughter them.” (1)

His statement, “Shaving and trimming are rites,” means that shaving and trimming are acts of worship. He explicitly mentioned this in order to refute those who say that they merely lift one of the prohibitions and are not rites in themselves. On that basis, any prohibited act could take the place of shaving, since the point, they claim, is simply to establish that one has exited ihram. Some have said something similar concerning the concluding salutation in prayer: that what is intended is to do something incompatible with the prayer, and that if one does something incompatible with it, this suffices in place of the salutation.

This is a weak view. Shaykh al-Islam said: “If that were so, there would be no difference between shaving one’s head and shaving one’s pubic hair”—on the view that the prohibitions of ihram apply to all bodily hair. He spoke the truth, may Allah have mercy on him. Based on the claim that it merely lifts a prohibition, they also said that it would suffice for a person to trim two or three hairs. All of these are views with no basis—that is, they have no evidence. The correct view is that it is a rite, an act of worship, and a means of drawing near to Allah.

(1) Its source has been cited previously; see p. 332.
وطاف، أو حلق وطاف حل التحلل الأول، مع أن الذي ورد في السنة أنه يحل بالرمي، أو بالرمي مع الحلق، لكنهم قالوا: لما كان طواف الإفاضة مؤثراً في التحلل الثاني فليكن مؤثراً في التحلل الأول، وذلك أنه إذا رمى وحلق وطاف حل التحلل الثاني. ولو قال قائل: بأن سائق الهدي يتوقف إحلاله على نحره أيضاً؛ لكان له وجه لقول النبي ﷺ: «إن معي الهدي فلا أحل حتى أنحر» (١). قوله: «والحلاق والتقصير نسك»، أي: أن الحلق والتقصير نسك، وإنما نص على هذا دفعاً لقول من يقول: إنه إطلاق من محظور، وليس نسكاً، وبناءً على هذا ينوب مناب الحلق فعل أي محظور؛ لأن المقصود أن يعلم أنه تحلل من إحرامه، كما قال بعضهم في التسليم في الصلاة: إن المراد فعل ما ينافي الصلاة، وأنه إذا فعل ما ينافي الصلاة فإنه يغني عن التسليم. وهذا قول ضعيف، يقول شيخ الإسلام: لو كان الأمر كذلك لكان لا فرق بين حلق الرأس وحلق العانة، على القول بأن محظورات الإحرام تشمل جميع شعور البدن، وصدق رحمه الله تعالى، وعلى القول بأنه إطلاق من محظور، قالوا: يجزئ لو يقص شعرتين أو ثلاثاً فيكفي، وهذه كلها أقوال لا أصل لها يعني ليس لها دليل، والصواب أنه نسك، وعبادة وقربة لله.
(١) سبق تخريجه ص (٣٣٢).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies