of its rulings. The words of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, must be precise and cannot be contradicted by any particular case. Therefore, it cannot be authentically traced back to the Prophet; rather, it is a statement of Ibn Abbas himself.
The correct view is that circumambulation of the House is not prayer; rather, it is an independent act of worship, just as spiritual retreat is.
If someone were to say: “The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, performed tawaf in a state of purity, as shown by the fact that he prayed two rak'ahs immediately after tawaf, and it has not been reported that he performed ablution,” we reply: Yes, we do not deny that it is better for a person to perform tawaf in a state of purity than otherwise, since it is a remembrance of Allah and an act of worship, and one should therefore purify himself for it. Hence, when the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, did not return the greeting of a man until he had performed dry ablution, he said: “I disliked mentioning Allah except in a state of purity.” (1) There is no doubt, then, that performing ablution for tawaf is preferable and more prudent.
If it is asked: “Does Ibn Abbas’s statement not constitute evidence?”
The answer is that a Companion’s statement has the status of a report traced back to the Prophet when it is not something open to personal reasoning. If it is open to personal reasoning, then it remains a statement of the Companion himself. The scholars have a well-known disagreement as to whether a Companion’s statement constitutes evidence.
As for citing the saying of Allah, Most High: “Purify My House for those who circumambulate it, those who retreat there in worship, and those who bow and prostrate.” [al-Baqarah: 125], this is a command to purify the House from polytheism