that is permissible, since it seeks thereby to protect itself. It is lawful to eat, and its compensation is a four-month-old female kid (1).
“For a hare: a female kid; and for a dove: a sheep.”
His statement, “For a hare: a female kid.” This is smaller than the four-month-old female kid—that is, it is approximately three and a half months old. The hare is well known (2).
The jerboa weighs no more than a rabbit’s head, yet the compensation due for it is greater than that due for a hare, because the determining factor is resemblance.
His statement, “For a dove: a sheep.” The resemblance between a dove and a sheep lies only in the manner of drinking, not in bodily form or appearance (3).
All of these rulings were issued by the Companions. Some are narrated from a single Companion, while others are narrated from more than one.
If we encounter game concerning which the Companions issued no ruling, we appoint two upright and knowledgeable arbiters and ask: What kind of grazing livestock does this resemble? If they say such and such, we rule accordingly. But if we find neither a ruling previously issued by the Companions nor any similar animal among the livestock, then it is among those for which there is no equivalent, and the value of the game is due, whether that value is small or great.
Question: May a woman be one of the two arbiters?
Answer: No, because Allah says, “two just men from among you.”