Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

In a narration recorded by al-Bazzar: “they would lie on their sides” (1).

The third view—which is the relied-upon position in the madhhab—is that sleep is not itself a nullifier of ablution; rather, it is a circumstance in which invalidation is likely. Nothing of it is excused except sleep in which invalidation is unlikely (2). Hence the author says: “except for a brief sleep while sitting or standing.”

The fourth view—which was the preference of Shaykh al-Islam, and which is correct—is that sleep is a circumstance in which invalidation is likely. Thus, if a person sleeps in a manner such that, were his ablution to be invalidated, he would be aware of himself, then his ablution remains valid. But if he sleeps in a manner such that, were he to pass wind, he would not be aware of himself, then his ablution has been invalidated (3).

On the basis of this view, the evidences are reconciled: the hadith of Safwan ibn Assal indicates that sleep invalidates ablution, whereas the hadith of Anas, may Allah be pleased with him, indicates that it does not.

Thus, what is reported of the Companions is understood to refer to the case where a person, were he to

(1) Also reported by Abu Ya'la, no. 3199. Al-Haythami said: “It was reported by al-Bazzar and Abu Ya'la, and its narrators are those of the Sahih.” Majma al-Zawa'id, 1/248. Regarding Abu Ya'la's chain, al-Busiri said: “This is an authentic chain, and al-Bazzar also reported it in his Musnad ...” Ithaf al-Khiyarah al-Maharah bi-Zawa'id al-Masanid al-Asharah, 1/folio 197. Ibn al-Qattan said: “Qasim ibn Asbagh said: Muhammad ibn Abd al-Salam al-Khushani related to us; Muhammad ibn Bashshar related to us; Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan related to us; Shu'bah related to us, from Qatadah, from Anas, who said: ... and he mentioned it. As you can see, it is authentic, transmitted by an imam from Shu'bah; take note of this.” Bayan al-Wahm wa al-Iham, no. 2806. (2) See al-Insaf, 2/20, 25. (3) See Majmu al-Fatawa, 21/230; al-Ikhtiyarat, p. 16.
وفي رواية البزَّار: «يضعون جنوبهم» (١). القول الثَّالث: ـ وهو المذهب ـ أن النَّوم ليس بِحَدَثٍ، ولكنه مظنَّة الحدث، ولا يُعفى عن شيء منه إلا ما كان بعيداً فيه الحدث (٢)، ولهذا قال المؤلِّف: «إِلا يسير نومٍ من قاعدٍ وقائم». القول الرَّابع: ـ وهو اختيار شيخ الإسلام، وهو الصَّحيح ـ: أنَّ النَّوم مظنَّة الحَدَث، فإِذا نام بحيث لو انتقض وضوءُه أحسَّ بنفسه، فإِن وضوءَه باقٍ، وإِذا نام بحيث لو أحدث لم يحسَّ بنفسه فقد انتقض وضوءُه (٣). وبهذا القول تجتمع الأدلة، فإن حديث صفوان بن عسَّال دلَّ على أنَّ النَّوم ناقض، وحديث أنس ﵁ دلَّ على أنه غيرُ ناقض. فيُحمل ما ورد عن الصَّحابة على ما إذا كان الإِنسانُ لو
(١) وأبو يعلى رقم (٣١٩٩). قال الهيثمي: «رواه البزار وأبو يعلى ورجاله رجال الصحيح»، المجمع (١/ ٢٤٨). قال البوصيري عن إسناد أبي يعلى: «هذا إسنادٌ صحيحٌ ورواه البزار في مسنده … »، «إتحاف الخيرة المهرة بزوائد المسانيد العشرة» (١/ل ١٩٧). قال ابن القطان: «قال قاسم بن أصبغ أحدثنا محمد بن عبد السلام الخُشني، حدثنا محمد بن بشار، حدثنا يحيى بن سعيد القطان، حدثنا شعبة، عن قتادة، عن أنس قال: … فذكره. وهو ـ كما ترى ـ صحيحٌ، من رواية إمام عن شعبة فاعلمه». «بيان الوهم والإيهام» رقم (٢٨٠٦). (٢) انظر: «الإنصاف» (٢/ ٢٠، ٢٥). (٣) انظر: «مجموع الفتاوى» (٢١/ ٢٣٠)، «الاختيارات» ص (١٦).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies