Others held that it does not invalidate ablution. (1)

This wind sometimes emerges from women’s private parts, and I do not think it emerges from men, except perhaps very rarely.

A stone also invalidates ablution if it emerges from the front or rear private passage. A person may suffer from a kidney stone which then descends and exits through his penis without urine. Likewise, if he swallows a bead and it emerges from his rear passage, his ablution is invalidated, since it falls under his statement: “Whatever emerges from a passage invalidates [ablution].”

This includes what is pure, such as semen, as well as what is impure: urine, pre-seminal fluid, post-urinary discharge, and blood.

This is the first nullifier of ablution. It is established by textual evidence and consensus, except in the case of that which does not normally emerge, concerning which there is disagreement. (2)

What emerges from the rest of the body, if it is urine or feces, ...

His statement, “What emerges from the rest of the body, if it is urine or feces,” refers to the second of the nullifiers of ablution.

It is coordinated with “whatever”; that is, what emerges from the rest of the body invalidates ablution if it is urine or feces. This is possible, especially in later times, such as when a person undergoes a surgical operation so that bodily waste exits from another location.

Thus, if urine or feces emerges from any place, it invalidates ablution, whether it is little or much.

Some scholars said: if the outlet is above the stomach