Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

The third case: if they break their fasts for their own welfare as well as that of the fetus or child, the author has not addressed this case. According to the established position of the school, the mother’s welfare takes precedence.

Accordingly, they need only make up the missed fasts. Thus, feeding is required in only one case: when breaking the fast is for the welfare of another—the fetus or the child. This is one of the views on the issue (1).

The second view is that they are not required to make up the fasts; rather, they are only required to feed a needy person, whether they break their fasts for their own welfare, for the child’s welfare, or for both together. They cite the following evidence:

  1. The hadith: “Indeed, Allah has waived fasting for the pregnant woman and the nursing woman” (2).

  2. The report of Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him: “…and if the nursing woman and the pregnant woman fear for their children, they break their fasts and feed a needy person” (3). He did not mention making up the fasts.

The third view is that they may choose between making up the fasts and feeding a needy person.

The fourth view is that she is required only to make up the fasts, without feeding a needy person (4). This

(1) This is the position of the school. (2) Reported by Imam Ahmad, 4:347; Abu Dawud, al-Siyam (Fasting), chapter: “Fasting While Travelling” (2408); al-Tirmidhi, al-Siyam, chapter: “The Concession Permitting Pregnant and Nursing Women to Break the Fast” (715); al-Nasai, al-Sawm (Fasting), chapter: “The Lifting of the Fast from the Traveller” (4:180); and Ibn Majah, al-Siyam, chapter: “Breaking the Fast for Pregnant and Nursing Women” (1667), on the authority of Anas ibn Malik, of Banu Qushayr, may Allah be pleased with him. Al-Tirmidhi graded it hasan (sound), and in Takhrij al-Mishkat (2025), its chain is described as good. (3) Its sourcing has already been given on p. 348. (4) It is also narrated from Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with them, as recorded in Musannaf Abd al-Razzaq (7564).
الحال الثالثة: إذا أفطرتا لمصلحتهما، ومصلحة الجنين، أو الطفل فالمؤلف سكت عن هذه الحال، والمذهب أنه يُغلب جانب مصلحة الأم. وعلى هذا فتقضيان فقط، فيكون الإطعام في حال واحدة وهي: إذا كان الإفطار لمصلحة الغير، الجنين أو الطفل، وهذا أحد الأقوال في المسألة (١). والقول الثاني: أنه لا يلزمهما القضاء، وإنما يلزمهما الإطعام فقط سواء أفطرتا لمصلحتهما أو مصلحة الولد أو للمصلحتين جميعاً واستدلوا بما يأتي: ١ ـ حديث: «إن الله وضع الصيام عن الحبلى والمرضع» (٢). ٢ ـ أثر ابن عباس ﵄: « … والمرضع والحبلى إذا خافتا على أولادهما أفطرتا وأطعمتا» (٣) ولم يذكر القضاء. القول الثالث: التخيير بين القضاء والإطعام. القول الرابع: يلزمها القضاء فقط دون الإطعام (٤)، وهذا
(١) وهو المذهب. (٢) أخرجه الإمام أحمد (٤/ ٣٤٧)؛ وأبو داود في الصيام/ باب في الصوم في السفر (٢٤٠٨)؛ والترمذي في الصيام/ باب ما جاء في الرخصة في الإفطار للحبلى والمرضع (٧١٥)؛ والنسائي في الصوم/ باب وضع الصيام عن المسافر (٤/ ١٨٠)؛ وابن ماجه في الصيام/ باب ما جاء في الإفطار للحامل والمرضع (١٦٦٧) عن أنس بن مالك ـ أحد بني قُشَير ﵁، وحسنه الترمذي، وفي تخريج «المشكاة» (٢٠٢٥) «سنده جيد». (٣) سبق تخريجه ص (٣٤٨). (٤) وهو مروي عن ابن عباس ﵄ كما في «مصنف عبد الرزاق» (٧٥٦٤).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies