Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

done so, we would have said: What Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, did is to be rejected, because the reason existed during the Prophet’s time, yet the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, did not prescribe anything concerning it. But when the reason for which Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, instituted the first call to prayer did not exist in the time of the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, then his practice is a sunnah to be followed, and we have been commanded to follow it.

“The Fitr charity is not obligatory for a recalcitrant wife; and if someone whose Fitr charity is incumbent upon another pays it himself without that person’s permission, it suffices...”

His statement, “The Fitr charity is not obligatory for a recalcitrant wife,” means that the husband is not required to pay the Fitr charity for a recalcitrant wife, because he is not obliged to provide her maintenance. This is based on the view that a person must pay the Fitr charity on behalf of those whom he supports and whose maintenance is obligatory upon him.

A recalcitrant wife is one who acts haughtily toward her husband and disobeys him in matters in which she is required to obey him; or she obeys him, but resentfully and begrudgingly. Thus, when he instructs her to do something, she refuses or delays carrying it out, and the like. This is because she must give him what is due to him willingly and contentedly, just as he too must give her what is due to her in the same manner.

His statement, “and if someone whose Fitr charity is incumbent upon another,” involves placing the object before the subject; that is, someone whose Fitr charity is obligatory upon another. For example, the wife’s Fitr charity is obligatory upon her husband, and the son’s Fitr charity is obligatory upon his father, and so on.

His statement, “then pays it himself without his permission, it suffices,” means that if someone whose Fitr charity is incumbent upon another pays it without the permission of the one responsible for his Fitr charity, it is valid on his behalf.

An example of this is if the wife pays it for herself without her husband’s permission: it suffices for her. It is known that the wife’s Fitr charity is obligatory upon her husband and is not incumbent upon

يفعله النبي ﷺ لقلنا: إن ما فعله عثمان ﵁ مردود؛ لأن السبب وجد في عهد النبي ﷺ ولم يسن النبي ﷺ فيه شيئاً، أما ما لم يوجد في عهد الرسول ﵊ السبب الذي من أجله سنَّ عثمان ﵁ الأذان الأول فإن سنتَهُ سنةٌ متبعةٌ، ونحن مأمورون باتباعها. وَلَا تَجِبُ لِنَاشِزٍ، وَمَنْ لَزِمَتْ غيرَهُ فِطْرَتُهُ فأخرجَ عن نفسِهِ بغيرِ إِذْنِهِ أَجْزَأَتْ ....... قوله: «ولا تجب لناشز» أي: لا تجب زكاة الفطر على الزوج للمرأة الناشز؛ لأنه لا تجب عليه لها النفقة، وهذا بناءً على أنه يجب على الإنسان أن يخرج زكاة الفطر عمن يمونه ومن تلزمه نفقته. والناشز هي التي تترفع على زوجها، وتعصيه فيما يجب عليها طاعته فيه، أو تطيعه ولكن متكرهة متبرمة، فإذا أمرها بأمر فإنها تتمنع وتتأخر عن تنفيذه وما أشبه ذلك؛ لأنه يجب عليها أن تبذل له ما يجب له بانشراح ورضا، كما أنه أيضاً يجب عليه أن يبذل لها ما يجب عليه لها بمثل ذلك. قوله: «ومن لزمت غيرَهُ فطرته» هذا من باب تقديم المفعول على الفاعل، أي: من وجبت فطرته على غيره، مثل الزوجة تلزم زوجها فطرتها، والابن تلزم فطرته أباه، وما أشبه ذلك. قوله: «فأخرج عن نفسه بغير إذنه أجزأت» أي: أخرج من تَلزَمُ فطرته غيره بغير إذن من تلزمه فطرته فإنها تجزئ عنه. مثال ذلك: الزوجة لو أخرجت عن نفسها بغير إذن زوجها أجزأتها، ومعلوم أن فطرة الزوجة واجبة على زوجها وليست على

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies