Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

An expiation is like a debt

His statement, “An expiation is like a debt,” means that if a person becomes liable for an expiation that reduces his wealth below the nisab, then no zakah is due on what he possesses. This is because an expiation is like a debt—indeed, it is a debt, except that its creditor is Allah, the Mighty and Majestic.

For example, a man possesses three hundred sa‘ of grain, but he is required to feed sixty needy persons, which obliges him to give thirty sa‘, if we hold that each sa‘ is sufficient for two persons. Accordingly, no zakah is due on the three hundred sa‘, because he owes an expiation that reduces the wealth below the nisab.

If someone were to ask: What is the evidence that an expiation, although it is a right due to Allah, is like a debt owed to another person?

We say: The evidence is that a woman asked the Prophet ﷺ about her mother, who had vowed to perform Hajj but did not do so before she died. He said to her: “What do you think: if your mother had owed a debt, would you have paid it?” She replied, “Yes.” He then said: “Fulfil what is due to Allah, for Allah is more deserving that His due be fulfilled.” (1) Thus, he treated the right of Allah, like the right of a human being, as a debt that is to be paid.

The reason the author, may Allah have mercy on him, specifically mentioned this issue, although it falls under the preceding one, is that there is disagreement concerning it even among those who hold that a debt prevents zakah from becoming obligatory when it reduces the wealth below the nisab. Some scholars distinguish between an expiation and a debt with regard to preventing zakah from being due when it reduces the wealth below the nisab. They argue that an expiation is a right due to Allah, the Exalted, connected to one’s legal liability, whereas zakah is a right due to Allah, the Exalted, connected both to one’s wealth and to one’s legal liability; and that which is connected to both wealth and legal liability deserves greater consideration. However, the established position of the school is that the two are alike.

(1) Reported by al-Bukhari in Kitab Jaza al-Sayd (Compensation for Game), in the chapter “Hajj and Vows on Behalf of the Deceased,” no. 1852, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him.
وَكَفَّارَةٌ كَدَيْنٍ .......... قوله: «وكفارة كدين» يعني لو وجب على الإنسان كفارة تنقص النصاب، فلا زكاة عليه فيما عنده؛ لأن الكفارة كالدين، بل هي دين، لكن الدائن فيها هو الله ﷿. مثال ذلك: رجل عنده ثلاثمائة صاع من الحبوب، لكن عليه إطعام ستين مسكيناً فيلزمه ثلاثون صاعاً، إذا قلنا: كل صاع لاثنين، وعليه فليس عليه زكاة في الثلاثمائة صاع؛ لأن عليه كفارة تنقص النصاب. فإن قال قائل: ما الدليل على أن الكفارة وهي حق لله كدين الآدمي؟ قلنا: الدليل «أن امرأة سألت النبي ﷺ أن أمها نذرت أن تحج فلم تحج حتى ماتت فقال لها: أرأيت لو كان على أمك دين أكنت قاضيته؟ قالت: نعم قال: «اقضوا الله فالله أحق بالوفاء» (١) فجعل حق الله كحق الآدمي ديناً يقضى. ووجه نص المؤلف ﵀ على هذه المسألة، مع أنها داخلة في التي قبلها، أن فيها خلافاً حتى على القول بأن الدين يمنع وجوب الزكاة إذا أنقص النصاب، فمن أهل العلم من يفرق بين الكفارة والدين في منع وجوب الزكاة إذا أنقصت النصاب؛ لأن الكفارة حق لله ـ تعالى ـ متعلق بالذمة، والزكاة حق لله ـ تعالى ـ متعلق بالمال والذمة، وما كان متعلقاً بالمال والذمة أولى بالمراعاة، ولكن المذهب أنهما سواء.
(١) أخرجه البخاري في جزاء الصيد/ باب الحج والنذور عن الميت … (١٨٥٢) عن ابن عباس ﵄.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies