belongs to the one who sold him, unless the buyer stipulates otherwise.” (1)
Thus, his saying, “his wealth”—that is, the wealth in his possession—“belongs to the one who sold him,” means that it does not belong to the slave himself. He is therefore like a poor person who possesses no wealth, and there is unanimous agreement that zakah is not obligatory upon the poor.
As for the Prophet’s saying, peace and blessings be upon him, “who possesses wealth,” the preposition in “possesses” denotes association or possession, just as one says that a riding animal has a saddle. Thus, this does not contradict what we have established.
- Islam, the opposite of which is disbelief. Zakah is not obligatory upon a disbeliever, whether he is an apostate or an original disbeliever, because zakah is a purification. Allah, Most High, says:
“Take from their wealth a charity by which you purify them.” [al-Tawbah 9:103]
The disbeliever is impure; even if he were to spend an earthful of gold, he would not be purified until he repents from his disbelief.
As for Allah’s saying:
“Woe to the polytheists—those who do not give zakah.”
What is meant here, according to most scholars, is the purification of the soul, due to Allah’s saying:
“Successful indeed is the one who purifies it.” [al-Shams 91:9]
Accordingly, the meaning of the verse is that they do not purify their souls; rather, they demean them and neglect them.
When we say that zakah is not obligatory upon the disbeliever, this does not mean that he will not be held to account for it. Rather, he will be held to account for it on the Day of Resurrection. Yet it is not obligatory upon him in the sense that we do not require him to pay it until he embraces Islam.
The evidence for this is the Prophet’s statement, peace and blessings be upon him, when he sent Mu'adh to Yemen, after mentioning monotheism and prayer: “Inform them that Allah has made charity obligatory upon them, to be taken from their wealthy and returned to their poor.” (2)