Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

“We were given rain by the rising of such-and-such a star,” he is a disbeliever in Me and a believer in the star.” (1)

This is an explicit text establishing that whoever says, “We were given rain by the rising of such-and-such a star,” is a disbeliever. This is why al-Mubdiʿ related the consensus of the scholars on this matter. (2)

Thus, for a person to say, “We were given rain by the rising of such-and-such a star,” is forbidden; rather, it is among the major sins. But does it constitute major disbelief that takes one outside the fold of Islam?

The answer is that this depends on the speaker’s belief. If he believes that the star itself created this rain, then he is guilty of disbelief that takes one outside the fold of Islam, because he has claimed that there is a creator alongside Allah. But if he believes that the star is a cause, then he is guilty of lesser disbelief.

He is deemed a disbeliever when he believes it to be a cause because he has affirmed a cause that Allah has not affirmed. The stars have no effect; they merely mark periods of time.

Question: What if he says, “We were given rain during the rising of such-and-such a star”?

Answer: This is permissible, because the preposition fī means “during” or “in,” denoting time. An example of this is the local colloquial use of the preposition bi- in this context, when what is intended is a time expression. They say, for example: “We were given rain in al-Murabbaʿāniyyah,” “We were given rain in al-Shabṭ,” and “We were given rain in al-ʿAqārib.” Al-ʿAqārib are the three suʿūd: Saʿd al-Dhābiḥ, Bulaʿ, and al-Suʿūd.

So, if he says, “We were given rain in Saʿd al-Suʿūd,” intending “during Saʿd al-Suʿūd,” as is customary in our local dialect, then he is not a disbeliever. The preposition bi- may also mean “in,” as in Allah’s saying: “And indeed, you pass by them in the morning, and at night” [al-Ṣāffāt: 137–138]—that is, at night.

(1) Narrated by al-Bukhari (1038) and Muslim (71). (2) Al-Mubdi', 2:212.
مطرنا بنوء كذا وكذا، فهو كافر بي مؤمن بالكوكب» (١). وهذا نص صريح في أن من قال: مطرنا بنوء كذا فهو كافر، ولهذا حكى في المبدع إجماع أهل العلم على ذلك (٢). إذاً قول الإِنسان: مطرنا بنوء كذا محرم، بل هو من كبائر الذنوب، وهل يكون كفراً أكبر مخرجاً عن الملة؟ الجواب: أنه بحسب عقيدة القائل، إن كان يعتقد أن النوء هو الذي خلق هذا المطر، فهو كافر كفراً مخرجاً عن الملة؛ لأنه ادَّعى أَنَّ مع الله خالقاً، وإن كان يعتقد أن النوء سبب فإنه كافر كفراً دون كفر. وإنما كان كافراً فيما إذا اعتقد أنه سبب؛ لأنه أثبت سبباً لم يثبته الله ﷿، فإن النجوم ليس لها أثر، وإنما هي أوقات فقط. مسألة: لو قال: مطرنا في نوء كذا؟ الجواب: هذا جائز؛ لأن في للظرفية، ومن ذلك استعمال العامة عندنا الباء هنا، وهم يريدون الظرفية، يقولون مثلاً: مطرنا بالمربعانية، ومطرنا بالشبط، ومطرنا بالعقارب، العقارب هي: السعود الثلاثة، سعد الذابح، وبلع، والسعود. فإذا قال: مطرنا بسعد السعود، وهو يقصد في سعد السعود كما هي اللغة العامية عندنا فهنا لا يكون كافراً، والباء قد تأتي بمعنى (في) مثل قوله تعالى: ﴿وَإِنَّكُمْ لَتَمُرُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ مُصْبِحِينَ *﴾ ﴿وَبِاللَّيْلِ﴾ [الصافات: ١٣٧، ١٣٨]، أي: في الليل.
(١) أخرجه البخاري (١٠٣٨)؛ ومسلم (٧١). (٢) «المبدع» (٢/ ٢١٢).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies