Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Most scholars—including a report from Ahmad—held that the prayer of one who stands alone behind the row is valid, whether he has an excuse or not, even if there is space in the row.

Some scholars said that the matter requires further distinction: if he has an excuse, the prayer is valid; but if he has no excuse, the prayer is not valid.

The majority cited as evidence that this worshipper prayed with the congregation and did what he was commanded to do. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: “The imam has only been appointed to be followed.” (1) He did follow his imam, saying the takbir when he said it, and so on.

They also argued that when the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, moved Ibn Abbas to his right, Ibn Abbas stood alone for a brief moment. Yet anything that invalidates the prayer does so whether it is extensive or slight, such as ritual impurity. Thus, if standing alone had invalidated the prayer, Ibn Abbas’s prayer would have been invalid.

They answered the hadith, “There is no prayer for one who prays alone behind the row,” (2) by saying that this negation is a negation of completeness, like the saying: “There is no prayer when food is present, nor while one is resisting the two excretions.” (3) It is known that if a person prays when food is present, his prayer is valid; and if he prays while resisting the two excretions—urine and feces—his prayer is valid.

As for the report that the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, “saw a man praying behind the row and instructed him to repeat the prayer,” (4) they answered that the soundness of this hadith is subject to scrutiny. Even if it is sound, perhaps there was some other factor that required the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, to instruct him to repeat the prayer. This was a particular incident, and we cannot state with certainty that the reason was his having prayed behind the row.

(1) Its source reference has been given above (205). (2) Its source reference has been given above, p. 268. (3) Its source reference has been given above (3/235). (4) Its source reference has been given above, p. 268.
وذهبَ أكثرُ أهلِ العِلمِ ـ وهو رواية عن أحمد ـ: إلى صِحَّة الصَّلاةِ منفرداً خلفَ الصَّفِّ، لعُذرٍ أو لغيرِ عُذر، ولو كان في الصَّفِّ سَعَةٌ. وقال بعضُ العلماءِ: في ذلك تفصيلٌ، فإنْ كان لعذرٍ صَحَّت الصَّلاةُ، وإنْ لم يكن لعُذر لم تَصِحَّ الصَّلاةُ. واستدلَّ الجمهورُ: بأن هذا المصلِّي صلَّى مع الجماعةِ، وفَعَلَ ما أُمِرَ به، وقد قال النَّبيُّ ﷺ: «إنَّمَا جُعِلَ الإِمامُ ليؤتمَّ به» (١) وقد ائتم بإمامِه فكبَّر حين كبّر .. إلخ. ولأنَّ ابنَ عبَّاسٍ لما أداره الرَّسولُ ﵊ عن يمينِهِ انفردَ بجُزءٍ يسيرٍ، والمُفسدُ للصَّلاةِ يستوي فيه الكثيرُ والقليلُ كالحَدَثِ فلو كان الانفرادُ مبطلاً لبطلت صلاةُ ابنِ عبَّاسٍ. وأجابوا عن حديث: «لا صلاةَ لمُنْفَرِدٍ خلفَ الصَّفِّ» (٢) أنَّ هذا النَّفْيَ نَفْيٌ للكمالِ كقوله: «لا صلاةَ بحضرةِ طعامٍ ولا وهو يدافِعُه الأخبثان» (٣)، ومعلومٌ أنَّ الإِنسانَ لو صَلَّى بحضرةِ طعامٍ فصلاتُه صحيحةٌ، ولو صَلَّى وهو يدافعُ الأخبثين ـ البولَ والغائطَ ـ فصلاتُه صحيحةٌ. وأما ما وَرَدَ أنَّ النَّبيَّ ﷺ «رأى رَجُلاً يصلِّي خلفَ الصَّفِّ فأمرَه أنْ يعيدَ الصَّلاةَ» (٤)، فأجابوا عنه بأن هذا الحديثَ في صحَّته نَظَرٌ، وإذا صَحَّ فلعلَّ هناك شيئاً أوجب أنْ يأمرَه النَّبيُّ ﷺ بإعادةِ الصَّلاةِ، وهذه قضيَّةُ عَينٍ لا نجزِمُ بأن السَّبَبَ هو كونه صَلَّى خلفَ الصَّفِّ.
(١) تقدم تخريجه (٢٠٥). (٢) تقدم تخريجه ص (٢٦٨). (٣) تقدم تخريجه (٣/ ٢٣٥). (٤) تقدم تخريجه ص (٢٦٨).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies