Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

We would say: This is correct. However, the apparent implication of the Messenger’s action—when he did not allow Jabir and Jabbar to stand on his right and left, but rather moved them behind him—may be said to indicate that the imam must stand ahead when there are two or more followers. Even so, there remains some reservation about this. The middle position is that there is no harm in it when necessity demands it; but where there is no necessity, it is not permissible.

His statement, “nor on his left,” means that a follower’s prayer is not valid if he stands to the imam’s left, provided that the imam’s right side is unoccupied. The evidence that this is a condition, based on the author’s own words, is that he said, “on his left only,” meaning: with no one standing on his right. As for the imam’s prayer, is it valid or not?

The answer is: if the imam remains upon the intention of leading the prayer, his prayer is not valid, because he intended to be an imam while praying alone. But if he intends to pray alone, then his prayer is valid.

If it is asked: What is the evidence that a follower’s prayer is invalid when he stands on the imam’s left while the imam’s right side is unoccupied?

We say: The evidence is that the Prophet ﷺ “stood one night to pray, and Ibn Abbas, who had slept at his house, joined him and stood on his left. The Prophet ﷺ then took hold of his head from behind and placed him on his right.” (1) Had this position been valid, the Prophet ﷺ would have allowed him to remain as he was.

If someone were to say: But this occurred in a voluntary prayer?

(1) Its source citation has preceded (p. 62).
قلنا: هذا صحيحٌ، لكن ظاهرُ فِعْلِ الرَّسولِ ﵊ حيث لم يُمَكِّنْ جابراً وجَبَّاراً مِن الوقوفِ عن يمينِه وشِمالِه، بل أخَّرهُما قد يقال: إنه يدلُّ على وجوبِ تقدُّمِ الإِمام إذا كان المأمومون اثنين فأكثر، لكن مع ذلك في النَّفْسِ منه شيءٌ، وإنَّما القولُ الوسَط أنَّه عندَ الضَّرورةِ لا بأسَ به، وإذا لم يكن هناك ضرورةٌ فلا. قوله: «ولا عن يساره» أي: لا تَصِحُّ صلاةُ المأمومِ إنْ وَقَفَ عن يسارِ الإِمامِ، لكن بشرط خُلوِّ يمينِه، والدَّليلُ على أن هذا شرطٌ مِن كلامِ المؤلِّفِ أنَّه قال: «عن يسارِه فقط» أي: دون أن يكون عن يمينِه أحدٌ، أما صلاةُ الإِمامِ فهل تَصِحُّ أم لا؟ الجواب: إنْ بقيَ الإِمامُ على نِيَّةِ الإِمامةِ، فإنَّ صلاتَه لا تَصِحُّ؛ لأنه نَوى الإِمامةَ وهو منفردٌ، وأمَّا إن نَوى الانفرادَ، فإنَّ صلاتَه صحيحةٌ. إذا قيل: ما الدَّليلُ على أنَّها لا تَصِحُّ عن يسارِه مع خلوِّ يمينِه؟ قلنا: دليلُ ذلك: أنَّ النَّبيَّ ﷺ «قام يُصلِّي ذاتَ ليلةٍ مِن الليلِ، وكان ابنُ عبَّاس ﵄ قد نامَ عندَه، فَدَخَلَ معه ابنُ عباس، ووَقفَ عن يسارِه، فأخذ النَّبيُّ ﷺ برأسِه مِن ورائِه فجعله عن يمينِهِ» (١) لأنَّها لو صحَّت لأقرَّه النَّبيُّ ﷺ على ذلك. فإن قال قائلٌ: هذا في النَّفْلِ؟
(١) تقدم تخريجه ص (٦٢).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies