Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

The second opinion on this issue is that it is valid for one performing an obligatory prayer to pray behind one performing a voluntary prayer.

The evidence for this is as follows:

First: The general purport of the Prophet’s statement (peace and blessings be upon him): “The one most versed in the Book of Allah should lead the people in prayer” (1). The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) stipulated no condition other than this. Thus, the general wording indicates that if the imam is offering a voluntary prayer while the follower is offering an obligatory prayer, the prayer is valid.

Second: Mu'adh ibn Jabal would pray the night prayer with the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), then return to his people and lead them in that same prayer (2). It is known that the first prayer was obligatory and the second voluntary, and he was not reproved for doing so.

If someone were to say: Perhaps the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not know of this?

The response is from two perspectives:

First: If he did know, then that is precisely the point; and it is apparent that he did know, because Mu'adh ibn Jabal was complained about to the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) for making the prayer lengthy. It is not unlikely that the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) was told: “This man comes late, prays with you, then comes to us and makes the prayer lengthy for us.” Indeed, this is explicitly mentioned in Sahih Muslim: “Mu'adh prayed the night prayer with you, then came and began with Surat al-Baqarah …” (3).

Second: If we assume that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not know, then Allah Most High certainly did know—

(1) Its source documentation has already been given; see p. 205. (2) and (3) Recorded by Muslim in The Book of Prayer, chapter: The Command for Imams to Keep the Prayer Brief, no. 465 (178).
القول الثاني في المسألة: أن صلاةَ المفترضِ خلفَ المتنفِّلِ صحيحةٌ. ودليل ذلك ما يلي: أولاً: عمومُ قولِ النَّبيِّ ﷺ: «يؤمُّ القومَ أقرؤهم لكتابِ اللهِ» (١) ولم يشترطِ النَّبيُّ ﷺ سوى ذلك، فالعمومُ يقتضي أنَّه لو كان الإِمامُ متنفِّلاً والمأمومُ مفترضاً فالصَّلاةُ صحيحةٌ. ثانياً: أنَّ معاذَ بنَ جَبَلَ كان يُصلِّي مع النَّبيِّ ﷺ صلاةَ العشاءِ، ثم يرجعُ إلى قومِهِ فيصلِّي بهم الصلاة نفسها (٢). ومعلومٌ أنَّ الصلاةَ الأُولى هي الفريضة، والثانية هي النافلة، ولم يُنْكَرْ عليه. فإن قال قائلٌ: لعلَّ النَّبيَّ ﷺ لم يعلمْ بذلك؟ فالجواب من وجهين: الأول: إنْ كان قد عَلِمَ فهذا هو المطلوبُ، والظَّاهرُ أنه عَلِمَ؛ لأنَّ معاذَ بنَ جَبَلَ شُكِيَ إلى الرَّسولِ ﵊ في أنه يُطيلُ، ولا يبعدُ أنْ يُقالَ للرَّسولِ ﷺ: إنَّ هذا الرَّجُل يأتي متأخِّراً يصلِّي عندك ثم يأتينا ويطيلُ بنا. بل قد جاء ذلك مصرَّحاً به في «صحيح مسلم». (إن معاذاً صلى معك العشاء، ثم أتى فافتتح بسورة البقرة … ) (٣). الثاني: إذا فَرَضْنا أنَّ النَّبيَّ ﷺ لم يعلمْ، فإنَّ الله تعالى قد
(١) تقدم تخريجه ص (٢٠٥). (٢) و (٣) أخرجه مسلم، كتاب الصلاة، باب أمر الأئمة بتخفيف الصلاة (٤٦٥) (١٧٨).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies