Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Issue: Prayer behind a disbeliever is categorically invalid, whether his disbelief is through belief, speech, action, or omission.

Disbelief through belief includes, for example, believing that there is another god besides Allah.

Disbelief through speech includes, for example, mocking Allah, His Messenger, or His religion. Whoever mocks Allah, His Messenger, or His religion is a disbeliever, even if he performs the prayer.

Disbelief through action includes, for example, prostrating to someone other than Allah, Most High.

Disbelief through omission includes, for example, abandoning the prayer. However, if his disbelief is due to abandoning the prayer and he then prays, he becomes Muslim. Yet they said: At the time of the opening takbir, he is a disbeliever, because he does not become Muslim except by praying. Accordingly, prayer behind one deemed a disbeliever for abandoning the prayer is invalid.

We know that it is not possible for a Muslim to pray behind a disbeliever. But if it were assumed that someone prayed behind a man and did not learn that he was a disbeliever until after the prayer, must he repeat the prayer or not?

The answer is that some scholars say that he need not repeat the prayer, because he is excused.

Others say that he must repeat the prayer, because one of the conditions for the validity of imamate is that the imam be Muslim.

If someone were to ask: “Can we distinguish between the cases and say that, if the sign of disbelief was apparent upon him, the prayer is invalid and the follower is not excused on account of ignorance, due to the presence of an indication; but otherwise, it is valid?”

The answer is: This distinction is possible. Thus, the preponderant view in this matter is that, if he was unaware, his prayer is valid.

مسألة: الكافرُ لا تصحُّ الصلاةُ خلفَه مطلقاً، سواءٌ كان كفرُه بالاعتقادِ، أو بالقولِ، أو بالفعلِ، أو بالتَّركِ. فالاعتقادُ، مثل: أن يعتقدَ أنَّ مع الله إلهاً آخر. والقولُ، مثل: أن يستهزئ باللهِ أو رسولِه، أو دينِه. فمَن كان يستهزئُ باللهِ أو رسولِه، أو دينِه فهو كافرٌ، ولو كان يصلِّي. والفِعلُ، مثل: أن يسجدَ لمن سوى الله تعالى. والتَّركُ، مثل: تَرْكُ الصَّلاةِ. لكن إذا كان كفرُه بتركِ الصَّلاةِ، ثم صلَّى أسْلَمَ. لكنهم قالوا: إنَّه حين تكبيرةِ الإحرامِ كافرٌ، لأنَّه لا يُسْلِمُ إلا إذا صَلَّى، وعلى هذا؛ فلا تصحُّ الصلاةُ خلفَ الكافرِ بتَرْكِ الصَّلاةِ. ونحن نعلمُ أنَّه لا يمكن أنْ يُصلِّي مسلمٌ خلفَ كافرٍ، لكن لو فُرضَ أنَّ شخصاً صلَّى خلفَ رَجُلٍ، ولم يعلَمْ أنه كافرٌ إلا بعدَ الصَّلاةِ فهل تلزمُه إعادةُ الصَّلاةِ أو لا؟ الجواب: مِن العلماءِ مَن قال: إنه لا يعيدُ الصَّلاةَ؛ لأنَّه معذورٌ. ومِنهم مَن قال: بل يعيدُ الصَّلاةَ، لأنَّ مِن شرطِ صحَّةِ الإِمامة أن يكونَ الإِمامُ مسلماً. ولو قال قائلٌ: هل يمكن أن نُفَصِّلَ ونقول: إن كانت علامةُ الكفرِ عليه ظاهرةٌ لم تصحَّ، ولم يُعذرْ بالجهلِ لوجود القرينةِ، وإلا فلا؟ فالجواب: يمكن ذلك، فالقولُ الراجحُ في هذه المسألة: أنه إن كان جاهلاً فإن صلاتَه صحيحةٌ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies