Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

in congregation is superior to the prayer offered alone by twenty-seven degrees.” (1) The fact that one is deemed superior to the other indicates that the lesser one also possesses merit; and if it possesses merit, it must be valid, for an invalid act has no merit in it—rather, it entails sin. This is clear evidence that the prayer of one who prays alone is valid, since it necessarily contains merit. Had it not been valid, it would have contained no merit.

However, Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, replied that this hadith concerns one who has an excuse—that is, one who prays alone due to a valid excuse. In his case, prayer in congregation is superior to his prayer by twenty-seven degrees. He said: There is nothing to prevent a deficiency from existing alongside a valid excuse. Thus, the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, described a woman as deficient in religion because she does not pray during the days of her menstruation (2), even though her not praying during menstruation is due to a legally valid excuse. Nevertheless, she is deficient in comparison to a man, while not sinful for leaving off the prayer. He said: Thus, when one who has an excuse prays in his home, prayer in congregation is superior to his prayer by twenty-seven degrees.

However, the following objection may be raised against him: the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “When a servant falls ill or travels, he is credited with what he used to do while healthy and resident.” (3) This indicates that whoever leaves off an act of obedience due to the excuse of illness is credited with it.

He could respond that this refers to one who was accustomed to performing it, for he said, “He is credited with what he used to do while healthy and resident.” Yet despite all this, Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah’s basis for this view is weak.

(1) Its source reference has been given previously (p. 138). (2) Narrated by al-Bukhari, Book of Menstruation, chapter: “The Menstruating Woman’s Refraining from Fasting” (no. 304). (3) Its source reference has been given previously (p. 80).
الجماعةِ أفضلُ مِن صلاةِ الفَذِّ بسبعٍ وعِشرين درجةً» (١) والمفاضلةُ: تدلُّ: على أنَّ المُفَضَّلَ عليه فيه فَضَلٌ، ويلزمُ مِن وجودِ الفَضْلِ فيه أنْ يكون صحيحاً؛ لأن غيرَ الصحيحِ ليس فيه فَضْلٌ، بل فيه إثمٌ، وهذا دليل واضحٌ على أنَّ صلاةَ الفَذِّ صحيحةٌ، ضرورةَ أنَّ فيها فضلاً؛ إذ لو لم تكن صحيحةً لم يكن فيها فَضْلٌ، لكن شيخُ الإسلام ﵀ أجاب: بأنَّ هذا الحديثِ في حَقِّ المعذور، أي: مَن صَلَّى وحده لعُذرٍ، فصلاةُ الجماعةِ أفضلُ مِن صلاتِهِ بسبعٍ وعِشرين درجةً، قال: ولا مانعَ مِن وجودِ النقصِ مع العُذرِ، فهذه المرأةُ وَصَفَها النَّبيُّ ﷺ بأنَّها ناقصةُ دِيْنٍ؛ لتركها الصَّلاةَ أيامَ الحيضِ (٢)، مع أن تركَهَا للصَّلاةِ أيام الحيضِ لعُذرٍ شرعيٍّ، ومع ذلك صارت ناقصةً عن الرَّجُل، وهي لم تأثم بهذا التَّرْكِ، قال: فالمعذورُ إذا صَلَّى في بيته فإنَّ صلاةَ الجماعةِ أفضلُ مِن صلاتِهِ بسبعٍ وعِشرين درجةً. ولكن يَرِدُ عليه: أنَّ النَّبيَّ ﷺ قال: «إذا مَرِضَ العبدُ أو سافرَ كُتِبَ له ما كان يعمل مقيماً صحيحاً» (٣)، فهذا دليلٌ على أنَّ مَن تَرَكَ الطاعةَ لعُذرِ المرضِ كُتبت له. ويمكن أن يجيب عنه: بأن المُرادَ مَن كان مِن عادتِهِ أن يفعلَ؛ لأنه قال: «كُتِبَ له ما كان يعملُ صحيحاً مقيماً»، ولكن مع كلِّ هذا؛ فإن مأخذَ شيخِ الإسلامِ ابنِ تيميةَ ﵀ في هذه المسألةِ ضعيف.
(١) تقدم تخريجه ص (١٣٨). (٢) أخرجه البخاري، كتاب الحيض، باب ترك الحائض الصوم (٣٠٤). (٣) تقدم تخريجه ص (٨٠).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies