Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

his prayer; and if he has prayed a complete four, they will be a humiliation for Satan.” (1)

Moreover, he performed this rakʿah while uncertain whether it was an extra rakʿah or not. Thus, he performed part of his prayer while unsure whether it belonged to it, and he must therefore perform the prostration for forgetfulness.

The evidence and reasoning for this view are strong. It is also supported by a third consideration: precaution.

If he is uncertain whether he omitted a pillar, then it is treated as though he omitted it; but he does not perform the prostration merely because he is uncertain whether he omitted an obligation, …

The second category is uncertainty regarding the omission of pillars, indicated by his statement: “If he is uncertain whether he omitted a pillar, then it is treated as though he omitted it.” That is, if he is uncertain whether he performed a pillar or omitted it, its ruling is that of one who omitted it.

For example, he stands for the second rakʿah and is uncertain whether he prostrated twice or only once. If he has begun the recitation, he does not return; but before beginning it, he returns.

According to the stronger view, he returns in all cases, so long as he has not reached its corresponding position in the following rakʿah. He should return, sit, then prostrate, and then stand, because uncertainty regarding the omission of a pillar is treated as an omission.

Uncertainty regarding the omission of a pillar is treated as an omission because the basic presumption is that it was not performed. Thus, if he is uncertain whether he performed it, but it seems more likely to him that he did perform it, then according to the stronger view—which is to act upon what seems more likely—he is legally regarded as having performed it and should not return. For we have mentioned that if he is uncertain about the number of rakʿahs, he builds upon what seems more likely to him; however, he must perform the prostration for forgetfulness after the salām.

The third category is uncertainty regarding the omission of an obligation, indicated by his statement:

(1) Its source reference has been given above on p. 380.
صلاته، وإنْ كان صَلَّى إتماماً لأربعٍ، كانتا ترغيماً للشَّيطان» (١). ولأنه أدَّى هذه الرَّكعة وهو شاكٌّ، هل هي زائدة أم غير زائدة؟ فيكون أدَّى جزءاً من صلاته متردِّداً في كونه منها فيلزمه السُّجود. وهذا القول دليله وتعليله قويٌّ، وفيه أيضاً ترجيح من وجه ثالث، وهو الاحتياط. وإِنْ شَكَّ فِي تَرْكِ رُكْنٍ فَكَتَرْكِهِ وَلَا يَسْجُدُ لِشَكِّهِ في تَرْكِ وَاجِبٍ، ......... القسم الثاني: الشكُّ في تَرْكِ الأركان، وأشار إليه بقوله: «وإن شكَّ في تَرْكِ رُكن فكتركه» أي: لو شَكَّ هل فَعَلَ الرُّكن أو تَرَكَه، كان حكمه حكم مَنْ تركه. مثاله: قام إلى الرَّكعة الثانية؛ فَشَكَّ هل سَجَدَ مرَّتين أم مرَّة واحدة؟ فإن شرع في القراءة فلا يرجع، وقبل الشُّروع يرجع. وعلى القول الرَّاجح: يرجع مطلقاً، ما لم يصل إلى موضعه مِن الرَّكعة التالية، فيرجعْ ويجلسْ، ثم يسجد، ثم يقوم، لأن الشَّكَّ في تَرْكِ الرُّكن كالتَّرك. وكان الشَّكُّ في تَرْكِ الرُّكن كالتَّرك؛ لأن الأصل عدمُ فِعْله، فإذا شَكَّ هل فَعَلَه، لكن إذا غلب على ظَنِّه أنه فَعَلَه؛ فعلى القول الرَّاجح وهو العمل بغلبة الظَّنِّ يكون فاعلاً له حكماً ولا يرجع؛ لأننا ذكرنا إذا شَكَّ في عدد الركعات يبني على غالب ظَنِّهِ، ولكن عليه سجود السَّهو بعد السلام. القسم الثَّالث: الشَّكُّ في تَرْكِ الواجب، وأشار إليه بقوله:
(١) تقدم تخريجه ص (٣٨٠).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies