Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

Some scholars held (1) that if he recites while bowing or prostrating, his prayer is invalidated; this was also the view of some of the Literalists.

They cited as evidence that the Prophet ﷺ was forbidden to recite the Quran while bowing or prostrating. (2) The basic principle regarding a prohibition is that it denotes forbiddance. Accordingly, reciting the Quran while bowing or prostrating is unlawful, and it is well known that when a person does something unlawful within an act of worship, it is invalidated.

But the majority said: this is not unlawful in itself; rather, it is unlawful by virtue of its being done in that particular place. This differs from ordinary speech, for speech in the prayer undoubtedly invalidates it, because it is unlawful in itself. As for this, recitation is not, in principle, unlawful in the prayer; rather, it is prescribed in its proper place. The prohibition concerns only its being done in this particular place, and thus it does not invalidate the prayer. This is the preponderant view: namely, that it does not invalidate it.

Further point: If one performs a recommended act in a place other than its proper place—for example, if he forgetfully raises his hands while descending to prostration—is the prostration of forgetfulness prescribed?

The answer is: it is not prescribed, because if the prostration is not prescribed for omitting it, despite that being a deficiency in the essential form of the prayer, then it is even less prescribed for performing it. Nevertheless, it does not invalidate the prayer, because it is of the same type as the prayer itself. However, it will come, Allah willing, in the chapter on the prostration of forgetfulness, that if one utters something prescribed in the prayer in a place other than its proper place, it is recommended for him to perform the prostration of forgetfulness—for example, if he says, “Glory be to my Lord, the Most High,” while bowing, then remembers and says, “Glory be to my Lord, the Magnificent.” In that case, he has uttered

(1) Al-Majmu', 3:386; Al-Insaf, 4:22-23. (2) Its source documentation was given above, p. 87.
وقال بعض العلماء (١): بل إذا قرأ في الرُّكوع أو في السُّجود بطلت، وبه قال بعض الظاهرية. واستدلُّوا: بأن النبيَّ ﷺ نُهيَ أن يقرأ القرآنَ وهو راكعٌ أو ساجدٌ (٢)، والأصل في النَّهي التحريم، وعلى هذا؛ فتكون قراءة القرآن في الرُّكوع أو السُّجود حراماً، ومعلوم أن الإِنسان إذا فَعَلَ ما يحرم في العبادة فسدت. لكن الجمهور قالوا: هذا ليس محرَّماً بعينه، لكنه محرَّم باعتبار موضعه، بخلاف الكلام، فالكلام في الصَّلاة لا شكَّ أنه يبطل الصَّلاة؛ لأنه محرَّم بعينه، أما هذا؛ فالأصل أن القراءة غير محرَّمة في الصَّلاة بل مشروعة في موضعها، لكن النَّهي عن كونها في هذا الموضع فقط، فلم يكن ذلك مبطلاً للصَّلاة، وهذا هو الرَّاجح، أعني: أنها لا تبطل. تتمة: ولو فَعَلَ المستحب في غير موضعه؛ بأن رَفَعَ يديه في الانحدار إلى السجود ناسياً؛ فهل يُشرع السُّجود؟ الجواب: لا يُشرع السُّجود؛ لأنه إذا لم يُشرع السُّجود لتركه وهو نقص في ماهيَّة الصَّلاة؛ فلا يُشرع لفعله مِن باب أَوْلَى، لكنه لا يبطل الصلاة؛ لأنه من جنسها، إلا أنه سيأتي ـ إن شاء الله ـ في باب سجود السَّهو أنه إذا أتى بقول مشروع في غير موضعه، فإنه يُسنُّ له أن يسجد للسَّهو، كما لو قال: «سبحان رَبِّيَ الأَعلى» في الرُّكوع، ثم ذَكَرَ فقال: «سبحان رَبِّي العظيم» فهنا أتى
(١) «المجموع» (٣/ ٣٨٦)، «الإنصاف» (٤/ ٢٢ ـ ٢٣). (٢) تقدم تخريجه ص (٨٧).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies